CBS News/NEW YORK TIMES Election Surveys, 1976  (ICPSR 7660 )

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 3: Data Files Description
Part 4: Variable Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

CBS News/NEW YORK TIMES Election Surveys, 1976

7660

CBS News. THE NEW YORK TIMES.

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Copyright ICPSR, 2000

August, 31, 2000

Jon Brode's SISO script

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

August, 31, 2000

ICPSR XML Version

Jon Brode

CBS News/NEW YORK TIMES Election Surveys, 1976

7660

CBS News. THE NEW YORK TIMES.

CBS News/NEW YORK TIMES Election Surveys, 1976

7660

CBS News. THE NEW YORK TIMES.

CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES ELECTION SURVEYS, 1976 PART 1: FEBRUARY SURVEY (ICPSR 7660) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES FIRST ICPSR EDITION, 1981 FIRST PRINTING, 1981 INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH P.O. BOX 1248 ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48106 C 1981 THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AND THE ROPER PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH CENTER, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FIRST PUBLISHED, 1981 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS DO NOT APPLY TO MEMBER INSTITUTIONS OF THE ICPSR. ALL OR PART OF THIS CODEBOOK MAY BE REPRODUCED FOR USE AT MEMBER INSTITUTIONS WITH APPROPRIATE CITATION TO THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR AND THE ICPSR. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ASSISTANCE ALL MANUSCRIPTS USING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) USED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH. THE DATA FOR THE CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES ELECTION SURVEYS, 1976, WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY CBS NEWS AND THE NEW YORK TIMES. NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PAR- TICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT OR THESIS ABSTRACT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. INTRODUCTION SERIES DESCRIPTION I STUDY DESCRIPTION IV RELATED PUBLICATIONS IV SAMPLING INFORMATION V WEIGHTING AND FREQUENCIES INFORMATION VII CODEBOOK INFORMATION VIII PROCESSING INFORMATION XI FILE STRUCTURE XI VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST XII CODEBOOK 1 APPENDIX 61 I SERIES DESCRIPTION CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES ELECTION SURVEYS, 1976 CBS NEWS AND THE NEW YORK TIMES WERE EQUAL PARTNERS IN A SERIES OF ELECTION SURVEYS COVERING THE 1976 UNITED STATES PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN. THE ICPSR CITATION REFLECTS ONLY AN ALPHABELTICAL ARRANGEMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS. THE SURVEYS WERE INTENDED TO PROVIDE ANOTHER DIMENSION TO THE POLITICAL REPORTING OF THE TWO ORGANIZATIONS. THE SURVEYS, USING EXTENSIVE COVERAGE EARLY IN THE PRIMARY CAMPAIGN, WERE DESIGNED TO MONITOR THE PUBLIC'S CHANGING PERCEPTION OF THE CANDIDATES, THE ISSUES, AND THE CANDIDATES' POSITION VIS-A-VIS THE ISSUES. IT WAS THE INTENTION OF THE TWO NEWS ORGANIZATIONS TO REDUCE SPECULATION IN THEIR CAMPAIGN REPORTING ABOUT THE VOTING PUBLIC'S STATE OF MIND. TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF SURVEYS WERE CONDUCTED. THE FIRST WERE TEN SEPARATE TELEPHONE SURVEYS, EACH WITH AN AVERAGE OF 1500 RANDOMLY SELECTED ADULTS. FIVE SURVEYS WERE CONDUCTED MONTHLY FROM FEBRUARY THROUGH JUNE, FOUR MORE BETWEEN EARLY SEPTEMBER AND THE GENERAL ELECTION--ONE IN SEPTEMBER AND ONE FOLLOWING EACH PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE. A FINAL SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED TWO DAYS AFTER THE GENERAL ELECTION. THE SECOND SET OF SURVEYS WERE DONE ON THE DAY OF THE ELECTION OR PRIMARY. INTERVIEWS WERE CONDUCTED AT THE POLLING PLACE AMONG A RANDOM SAMPLE OF PEOPLE THAT HAD JUST VOTED IN EITHER THE DEMOCRATIC OR REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION. THESE SURVEYS WERE CONDUCTED IN THE FOLLOWING PRIMARY STATES: CALIFORNIA, FLORIDA, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW YORK, OHIO, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA AND WISCONSIN. ADDITIONALLY, FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, THERE WAS A NATIONWIDE ELECTION DAY SURVEY CONDUCTED AT THE POLLING PLACE WITH VOTERS THROUGHOUT THE NATION. RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED TO IDENTIFY THEIR POLITICAL PARTY PREFERENCE, THE CANDIDATE FOR WHOM THEY WOULD VOTE OR HAD VOTED IN THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, THEIR ATTITUDES TOWARD NATIONAL ISSUES, THE ISSUES AND CANDIDATE CHARACTERISTICS THAT WERE IMPORTANT TO THEM IN THEIR CHOICE OF A CANDIDATE, AND SEVERAL DEMOGRAPHICS. II SERIES SAMPLING INFORMATION AND DATES OF INTERVIEWING NATIONAL SURVEYS SURVEY AND POPULATION IN SAMPLE REINTERVIEWS DATES OF SAMPLE SIZE INCLUDED INTERVIEWING IN TOTAL FEBRUARY ALL ADULTS 1458 (2/2-2/8) MARCH ALL ADULTS 1524 303 1ST (3/18-3/24) INTERVIEWED IN FEBRUARY APRIL ALL ADULTS 1464 354 1ST (4/10-4/15) INTERVIEWED IN MARCH MAY ALL ADULTS 1501 339 1ST (5/19-5/23) INTERVIEWED IN APRIL JUNE ALL ADULTS 1454 306 1ST (6/15-6/20) INTERVIEWED IN MAY 286 1ST INTERVIEWED IN FEBRUARY SEPTEMBER REGISTERED 1703 (8/29-9/5) ONLY DEBATE ONE REGISTERED 1167 ALL 1167 1ST (9/24-9/25) ONLY INTERVIEWED IN SEPTEMBER DEBATE TWO REGISTERED 1761 (10/8-10/12) ONLY DEBATE THREE REGISTERED 2025 (10/24-10/27) ONLY ELECTION DAY VOTERS ONLY 15,300 (NOV.2) POST-ELECTION ALL ADULTS 2042 1699 REGISTERED (11/4-11/8) 343 UNREGISTERED ALL 1ST INTERVIEWED AFTER DEBATE 3 III STATE PRIMARY DAY SURVEYS *IN THESE STATES REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS WERE SURVEYED WITH DIFFERENT QUESTIONNAIRES AND ARE CONTAINED IN SEPARATE DATA FILES. STATE AND TOTAL DEMOCRATS REPUBLICANS DATE OF INTERVIEW *CALIFORNIA 2411 1492 919 (JUNE 8) FLORIDA 1680 1166 514 (MARCH 9) ILLINOIS 1060 716 344 (MARCH 16) *INDIANA 1471 816 655 (MAY 4) MASSACHUSETTS 1093 783 211 (MARCH 2) *MICHIGAN 1840 838 1002 (MAY 18) NEW HAMPSHIRE 1235 561 674 (FEBRUARY 24) NEW YORK 1074 1074 --- (APRIL 6) *OHIO 1650 983 667 (JUNE 8) OREGON 2089 1262 827 (MAY 25) PENNSYLVANIA 1507 1507 --- (APRIL 27) WISCONSIN 1835 1014 821 (APRIL 6) IV STUDY DESCRIPTION - PART 1 FEBRUARY SURVEY THE FEBRUARY SURVEY WAS A NATIONWIDE SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TELEPHONE WITH 1458 REGISTERED VOTERS. THE RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED ABOUT THEIR PREFERRED PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, THEIR RATINGS OF THE CANDIDATES' QUALIFICATIONS AND POSITIONS VIS-A-VIS THE CURRENT ISSUES, THEIR OPINIONS ON A VARIETY OF POLITICAL ISSUES, AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON EDUCATION, AGE, ETHNIC AND RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION, OCCUPATION AND INCOME. THERE ARE 147 VARIABLES IN THE FEBRUARY SURVEY DATASET. RELATED PUBLICATIONS CHARLES H.BACKSTROM AND GERALD D. HIRSH, SURVEY RESEARCH. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1963. JOSEPH WAKSBERG, "SAMPLING METHODS FOR RANDOM-DIGIT DIALING," JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, VOL. 73 (MARCH, 1978) 40-46. V SAMPLING INFORMATION THE INDIVIDUALS COMPRISING THE SAMPLE IN THE CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES NATIONWIDE TELEPHONE SURVEYS WERE SELECTED THROUGH A VARIATION OF RANDOM-DIGIT DIALING TECHNIQUES USING A PROCEDURE DESIGNED BY WARREN J. MITOFSKY IN 1970 FOR CBS NEWS SURVEYS. THE OPTIMIZATION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS DONE BY JOSEPH WAKSBERG AND IS DESCRIBED IN THE RECENT PUBLICATION "SAMPLING METHODS FOR RAMDOM-DIGIT DIALING," JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION. (VOL.73) MARCH, 1978, PP. 40-46. PRIMARY SAMPLING UNITS (PSU'S) ARE BLOCKS OF 100 TELEPHONE NUMBERS, IDENTICAL THROUGH THE EIGHTH DIGIT (AREA CODE-EXCHANGE-XX__). THE PSU'S WERE STRATIFIED BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION, AREA CODE AND SIZE OF PLACE. FOUR SIZE OF PLACE STRATA WERE CRUDELY DETERMINED BY USING THE GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES OF THE PLACES WHERE THE CENTRAL OFFICES ARE LOCATED. THESE COORDINATES ARE ASSIGNED BY THE PHONE COMPANY TO EVERY EXCHANGE. ALL EXCHANGES IN THE SAME CITY WOULD HAVE THE SAME COORDINATES. LARGE AND SMALL CITY STRATA WERE DEFINED BY COUNTING THE NUMBER OF EXCHANGES PER PAIR OF COORDINATES. SUBURBS ARE EXCHANGES WITHIN 15 MILES OF LARGE CITIES. THE LAST STRATUM INCLUDES THE REMAINING EXCHANGES. THE NUMBER OF WORKING RESIDENTIAL PHONE NUMBERS PER EXCHANGE VARIES CONSIDERABLY BY STRATUM. THE FIRST STAGE SELECTION WAS SYSTEMATIC WITH A UNIFORM RATE, FROM A COMPLETE LIST OF ALL EXISTING AREA CODES AND EXCHANGES IN THE COTERMINOUS UNITED STATES. THE LAST TWO DIGITS WERE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED WITHIN EACH PSU. THE NUMBER WAS CALLED FOR A SCREENING INTERVIEW. IF IT WAS A WORKING RESIDENTIAL NUMBER, THE PSU (I.E., THE BLOCK OF 100 TELEPHONE NUMBERS) WAS RETAINED IN THE SAMPLE. THREE RESIDENCES WERE TO BE CONTACTED WITHIN A PSU FOR EACH SURVEY. THE ACTUAL TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR EACH SURVEY WERE SELECTED IN SMALL GROUPS (REPLICATES), TO PERMIT VARYING SAMPLE SIZES WHILE RETAINING APPROPRIATE GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION. VI THE INITIAL SCREENING OF A PSU TAKES ADVANTAGE OF THE TELEPHONE COMPANY'S PRACTICE OF ASSIGNING WORKING TELEPHONE NUMBERS IN BLOCKS OF 100'S OR 1000'S BEFORE STARTING A NEW BLOCK. THE DESIGN IS SELF-WEIGHTING, AS THE LIKELIHOOD OF AN EIGHT DIGIT GROUP OR "BLOCK" BEING SELECTED AS A PSU IS EXACTLY PROPORTIONAL TO THE NUMBER OF WORKING NUMBERS IN THE BLOCK. RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED WITHIN HOUSEHOLD USING A METHOD DEVELOPED BY KISH, AND MODIFIED BY BACKSTROM AND HIRSH.(CHARLES H. BACKSTROM AND GERALD D. HIRSH, SURVEY RESEARCH. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1963, PP. 52-58.) THE PROBABILITY OF SELECTION DEPENDS ON THE SIZE OF HOUSEHOLD. THE PROCEDURE PROVIDES AN UNBIASED SELECTION OF HOUSEHOLDS OF FEWER THAN FIVE ADULTS. THE RESPONDENT SELECTION CONTROLS FOR SEX AND THE RELATIVE AGE COMPOSITION OF THE HOUSEHOLD. THE FEBRUARY SURVEY INCLUDES AN OVERSAMPLING OF REPUBLI- CANS TO INSURE THAT THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICANS WOULD BE LARGE ENOUGH FOR RELIABLE ANALYSIS. TO DO THIS, ADDITIONAL RANDOM REPLICATES BEYOND THOSE USED TO OBTAIN THE ORIGINAL SAMPLE WERE INCLUDED. IN THESE ADDITIONAL REPLICATES, ONLY REPUBLICAN RESPONDENTS WERE INTERVIEWED. RESPONDENTS ARE IDENTIFIED AS HAVING BEEN SELECTED AS PART OF THE ADDITIONAL SAMPLE OF REPUBLICANS BY A CODE IN VARIABLE 15 OF THE SURVEY. THE ENTIRE SAMPLE IS WEIGHTED TO REFLECT THE ACTUAL PROBABILITY OF SELECTION, INCLUDING THIS OVER SAMPLING. VII WEIGHTING AND FREQUENCIES INFORMATION THE STUDY CONTAINS A WEIGHT VARIABLE (V5) WHICH MUST BE USED IN ANY DATA ANALYSIS. THERE ARE THREE IMPLIED DECIMAL PLACES IN THE WEIGHT VARIABLE. THE FREQUENCIES WHICH APPEAR IN THE CODEBOOK NEXT TO THE CODE VALUES FOR EACH VARIABLE ARE WEIGHTED. DECIMAL PLACES HAVE BEEN ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER. THE WEIGHT ASSIGNED TO EACH RESPONDENT IS THE INVERSE OF THE PROBABILITY OF SELECTION, MODIFIED BY A SERIES OF RATIO ESTIMATES. THE FIRST STAGE IS ESSENTIALLY A NON-INTERVIEW ADJUSTMENT WITHIN GEOGRAPHIC REGION. FOR EACH REGION, AN ADJUSTMENT WAS MADE TO APPROXIMATE THE NUMBER OF ADULTS IN THE REGION. IN THE NEXT STAGE, RACE BY SEX WERE THE RATIO ESTIMATE CHARACTERISTICS, AND THE FINAL STAGE WAS AGE BY EDUCATION. (ON OCCASION, BECAUSE OF A SMALL NUMBER OF SAMPLE CASES IN SOME CELLS AT THE FINAL STAGE, SOME EDUCATIONAL GROUPS WERE COLLAPSED WITHIN AGE CATEGORIES.) FOR CONVENIENCE, ALL WEIGHTS WERE REDUCED BY A CONSTANT SO THAT THE RESULTING SUM OF THE WEIGHTS IS THE SAMPLE SIZE. VIII CODEBOOK INFORMATION THE EXAMPLE BELOW ILLUSTRATES THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE CODEBOOK FOR A TYPICAL VARIABLE. THE NUMBERS IN CIRCLES DO NOT APPEAR IN THE CODEBOOK, BUT REFER TO THE EXPLANATIONS WHICH FOLLOW THIS EXAMPLE. ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 VAR 19 2 5A WHEN R DECID CANDIDATE 3 MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 19 4 LOC 36 WIDTH 1 5 ------------- 6 ------------ 7 Q.3. VOTERS CHOOSE THEIR CANDIDATES AT DIFFERENT TIMES DURING THE CAMPAIGN. WHEN DID YOU DECIDE ON WHO YOU WOULD VOTE FOR? WAS IT AFTER THE THIRD DEBATE, AFTER THE SECOND DEBATE, AFTER THE FIRST DEBATE, AFTER THE CONVENTIONS, AFTER THE PRIMARIES, OR DID YOU KNOW ALL ALONG WHO YOU WERE GOING TO VOTE FOR? 8 ---------------------------- 9 ---------------------------- 10 11 12 149 1. AFTER THE THIRD DEBATE 128 2. AFTER THE SECOND DEBATE 101 3. AFTER THE FIRST DEBATE 322 4. AFTER THE CONVENTIONS 147 5. AFTER THE PRIMARIES 553 6. KNEW ALL ALONG 518 0. INAP., CODED 3, 4, 8 OR 9 IN Q.1; SHOULD HAVE BEEN CODED INAP BUT WAS NOT 54 8. DK 23 9. NO ANSWER, REFUSED; ERRONEOUSLY CODED INAP ........................................................... 1. INDICATES THE VARIABLE AND REFERENCE NUMBERS. A VARI- ABLE AND A REFERENCE NUMBER ARE ASSIGNED TO EACH ITEM IN THE STUDY. IN THIS CODEBOOK, WHICH DOCUMENTS THE ARCHIVED DATASET, THESE NUMBERS ARE IDENTICAL. SHOULD THE DATA BE SUBSET OR REARRANGED BY AN OSIRIS PROGRAM (E.G., MMP TO INTERSPERSE DATA FROM ANOTHER SOURCE, OR TCOT TO PRODUCE AN ANALYSIS DECK), THE VARIABLE NUMBERS WOULD CHANGE TO REFLECT THE ORDER OF THE NEW DATASET, WHILE THE REFERENCE NUMBERS WOULD REMAIN UNCHANGED TO REFLECT THE VARIABLE NUMBER IN THE CODEBOOK DESCRIBING THE ARCHIVED DATASET. IX 2. INDICATES THE ABBREVIATED VARIABLE NAME (MAXIMUM OF 24 CHARACTERS) USED IN THE OSIRIS SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY THE VARIABLE FOR THE USER. AN EXPANDED VERSION OF THE VARIABLE NAME CAN BE FOUND IN THE VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST. THE QUESTION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE VARIABLE APPEARS AT THE BEGINING OF THE VARIABLE NAME. 3. INDICATES THE CODE VALUES OF MISSING DATA. IN THIS EXAMPLE, CODE VALUES EQUAL TO ZERO AND THOSE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO EIGHT ARE MISSING DATA (MD=0 OR GE 8). ALTERNATIVE STATEMENTS FOR OTHER VARIABLES ARE "MD=0", "MD=9", OR "NO MISSING DATA CODES". SOME ANALYSIS SOFTWARE PACKAGES (INCLUDING THE OSIRIS SOFTWARE PACKAGE) REQUIRE THAT CERTAIN TYPES OF DATA WHICH THE USER DESIRES TO EXCLUDE FROM ANALYSIS CAN BE DESIGNATED AS "MISSING DATA", E.G., INAPPROPRIATE, UNASCERTAINED, UNASCERTAINABLE OR AMBIGOUS DATA CATEGORIES. ALTHOUGH THESE CODES ARE DEFINED AS MISSING DATA CATEGORIES, THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE USER SHOULD NOT OR CANNOT USE THEM IN A SUBSTANTIVE ROLE IF SO DESIRED. 4. INDICATES THE STARTING LOCATION AND WIDTH OF THIS VARI- ABLE WHEN THE DATA ARE STORED ON A MAGNETIC TAPE IN THE OSIRIS FORMAT. IF THE VARIABLE IS OF A MULTIPLE- RESPONSE TYPE, THE WIDTH REFERENCED IS THAT OF A SINGLE RESPONSE. 5. INDICATES THE LOCATION BY DECK AND COLUMN(S) OF THIS VARIABLE WHEN THE DATA ARE ON CARDS OR IN A CARD-IMAGE FORMAT (EITHER 80- OR 84-COLUMN FORMAT). 6. A VARIABLE CONTAINING DATA WITH IMPLIED DECIMALS IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE "XX DEC PLACE(S)", WHERE XX IS THE NUMBER OF DECIMAL PLACES IMPLIED (NOT PUNCHED) IN THE VARIABLE. 7. THIS IS THE FULL TEXT (QUESTION) SUPPLIED BY THE INVESTIGATOR TO DESCRIBE THE VARIABLE. THE QUESTION TEXT REFLECTS THE ORIGINAL WORDING OF THE QUESTION- NAIRE ITEM. X 8. INDICATES AN ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR EXPLANATION APPENDED TO THE VARIABLE DESCRIPTION. 9. A VARIABLE WHICH HAS A FOOTNOTE ASSOCIATED WITH IT IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE "SEE NOTE(S) X", WHERE X IS THE NUMBER OF THE FOOTNOTE REFERENCED. 10. INDICATES THE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF EACH CODE VALUE FOR THIS VARIABLE. 11. INDICATES THE CODE VALUES OCCURRING IN THE DATA FOR THIS VARIABLE, WHERE RANGES OF VALUES ARE INDICATED BY ..., THE "..." DO NOT APPEAR IN THE DATA. 12. INDICATES THE TEXTUAL DEFINITIONS OF THE CODES. ABBREVIATIONS COMMONLY USED IN THE CODE DEFINITIONS ARE "DK" (DON'T KNOW), "NA" (NOT ASCERTAINED), AND "INAP" (INAPPROPRIATE). THE PHRASES "SHOULD HAVE BEEN CODED INAP BUT WAS NOT" AND "ERRONEOUSLY CODED INAP," WHICH APPEAR FREQUENTLY IN THE "INAP" AND "NO ANSWER" CODE DEFINITIONS, REFLECT RECODING THAT WAS DONE TO THE ORIGINAL DATA TO ACHIEVE CONSISTENCY. RESPONDENTS WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN CODED "INAP" BUT WERE NOT HAVE BEEN RECODED TO "INAP", AND THOSE WHO WERE CODED "INAP" BUT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN HAVE BEEN RECODED TO THE "NO ANSWER" CATEGORY. XI PROCESSING INFORMATION THIS STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD ICPSR PROCEDURES. THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR INCONSISTENT CODES, ILLEGAL CODES AND BLANKS WHICH, WHENEVER FOUND, WERE CORRECTED BY RECODING TO THE APPROPRIATE MISSING DATA CATEGORIES. THE PHRASES "SHOULD HAVE BEEN CODED INAP BUT WAS NOT" AND "ERRONEOULSY CODED INAP," WHICH APPEAR FREQUENTLY IN THE "INAP" AND "NO ANSWER" CODE DEFINITIONS, REFLECT RECODING THAT WAS DONE TO THE ORIGINAL DATA TO ACHIEVE CONSISTENCY. RESPONDENTS WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN CODED "INAP" BUT WERE NOT HAVE BEEN RECODED TO "INAP", AND THOSE WHO WERE CODED "INAP" BUT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN HAVE BEEN RECODED TO THE "NO ANSWER" CATEGORY. STATEMENTS BRACKETED IN "(" AND ")" SIGNS IN THE BODY OF THE CODEBOOK AND THE FOOTNOTES WERE ADDED BY THE PROCESSORS FOR EXPLANATORY PURPOSES. FILE STRUCTURE THE DATA ARE AVAILABLE FROM ICPSR IN TWO FORMATS: A CARD-IMAGE FILE AND AN OSIRIS DATASET. THE CARD-IMAGE FILE CONTAINS 3 DECKS PER RESPONDENT ON 80-COLUMN PUNCHED CARDS. THE DATA ARE SORTED BY RESPONDENT NUMBER WITH ALL DECKS (CARDS) FOR EACH CASE TOGETHER IN ASCENDING ORDER. THERE ARE TWO COMPONENTS TO THE OSIRIS DATASET. THE OSIRIS DICTIONARY CONTAINS ALL TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR EACH VARIABLE IN THE OSIRIS DATAFILE. THE DICTIONARY OR DICTIONARY-CODEBOOK FILE IS USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OSIRIS SOFTWARE PACKAGE. THE OSIRIS DATA FILE IS A SINGLE LOGICAL RECORD OF 172 BYTES FOR EACH RESPONDENT. THERE ARE 147 VARIABLES IN THE DATASET. THE OSIRIS DATA FILE CAN BE ACCESSED DIRECTLY BY SOFTWARE PACKAGES WHICH DO NOT USE THE OSIRIS DICTIONARY BY SPECIFYING THE TAPE LOCATIONS OF THE DESIRED VARIABLES. TAPE LOCATIONS ARE PROVIDED IN THIS CODEBOOK. XII VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST VAR. NO. STUDY INFORMATION 1 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7660 2 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 3 ICPSR PART NUMBER-001 4 RESPONDENT'S I.D. 5 WEIGHT VARIABLE BACKGROUND AND CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION 6 CBS REGION CODE 7 CENSUS REGION CODE 8 COMPLETED INTERVIEW 9 RESPONDENT SELECTION KEY NUMBER 10 SURVEY NUMBER 11 NUMBER OF ADULTS IN HOUSEHOLD 12 RESPONDENT'S SEX 13 STATE CODE 14 TELEPHONE NUMBER 15 SELECTION STATUS 16 DOES RESPONDENT THINK OF SELF AS REPUBLICAN, DEMOCRAT OR INDEPENDENT 17 IS RESPONDENT CLOSER TO THE REPUBLICANS OR THE DEMOCRATS R'S ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES 18 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: GOVERNMENT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO WORK 19 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: IT IS NOT IN OUR INTEREST TO BE SO FRIENDLY WITH RUSSIA 20 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: RIGHT OF ABORTION BE LEFT TO THE WOMAN AND HER DOCTOR 21 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: GOVERNMENT HAS PAID TOO MUCH ATTENTION TO MINORITIES 22 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: MILITARY DEFENSE SPENDING SHOULD BE REDUCED 23 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: GOVERNMENT USUALLY FAILS TO ACT ON IMPORTANT MATTERS 24 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: GOVERNMENT MUST HAVE A MORE BALANCED BUDGET 25 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: RELAX POLLUTION LAWS TO HELP ENERGY CRISIS 26 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: RACIAL INTEGRATION OF THE SCHOOLS SHOULD BE ACHIEVED 27 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: IT WOULD BE BETTER IF STATES RAN HELP PROGRAMS 28 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: STATES SHOULD BE FREE TO RUN HELP PROGRAMS R'S ASSESSMENT OF THE CANDIDATES 29 RESPONDENT'S IMPRESSION OF RONALD REAGAN 30 RESPONDENT'S IMPRESSION OF MORRIS UDALL 31 RESPONDENT'S IMPRESSION OF SARGENT SHRIVER 32 RESPONDENT'S IMPRESSION OF BIRCH BAYH 33 RESPONDENT'S IMPRESSION OF HENRY JACKSON 34 RESPONDENT'S IMPRESSION OF FRED HARRIS 35 RESPONDENT'S IMPRESSION OF JIMMY CARTER 36 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF RONALD REAGAN 37 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF MORRIS UDALL 38 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF SARGENT SHRIVER 39 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF BIRCH BAYH 40 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF HENRY JACKSON 41 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF FRED HARRIS 42 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF JIMMY CARTER 43 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF GERALD FORD 44 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF GEORGE WALLACE 45 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF HUBERT HUMPHREY R'S ASSESSMENT OF CANDIDATE ISSUE POSITIONS 46 IS RONALD REAGAN LIKELY TO FAVOR A MORE BALANCED BUDGET 47 IS MORRIS UDALL LIKELY TO FAVOR A MORE BALANCED BUDGET 48 IS SARGENT SHRIVER LIKELY TO FAVOR A MORE BALANCED BUDGET 49 IS BIRCH BAYH LIKELY TO FAVOR A MORE BALANCED BUDGET 50 IS HENRY JACKSON LIKELY TO FAVOR A MORE BALANCED BUDGET 51 IS FRED HARRIS LIKELY TO FAVOR A MORE BALANCED BUDGET 52 IS JIMMY CARTER LIKELY TO FAVOR A MORE BALANCED BUDGET 53 IS GERALD FORD LIKELY TO FAVOR A MORE BALANCED BUDGET 54 IS GEORGE WALLACE LIKELY TO FAVOR A MORE BALANCED BUDGET 55 IS RONALD REAGAN LIKELY TO FAVOR A LAW TO BAN ABORTIONS 56 IS MORRIS UDALL LIKELY TO FAVOR A LAW TO BAN ABORTIONS 57 IS SARGENT SHRIVER LIKELY TO FAVOR A LAW TO BAN ABORTIONS 58 IS BIRCH BAYH LIKELY TO FAVOR A LAW TO BAN ABORTIONS 59 IS HENRY JACKSON LIKELY TO FAVOR A LAW TO BAN ABORTIONS 60 IS FRED HARRIS LIKELY TO FAVOR A LAW TO BAN ABORTIONS 61 IS JIMMY CARTER LIKELY TO FAVOR A LAW TO BAN ABORTIONS 62 IS GERALD FORD LIKELY TO FAVOR A LAW TO BAN ABORTIONS 63 IS GEORGE WALLACE LIKELY TO FAVOR A LAW TO BAN ABORTIONS 64 IS RONALD REAGAN LIKELY TO BELIEVE WE ARE TOO FRIENDLY WITH RUSSIA 65 IS MORRIS UDALL LIKELY TO BELIEVE WE ARE TOO FRIENDLY WITH RUSSIA 66 IS SARGENT SHRIVER LIKELY TO BELIEVE THAT WE ARE TOO FRIENDLY WITH RUSSIA 67 IS BIRCH BAYH LIKELY TO BELIEVE WE ARE TOO FRIENDLY WITH RUSSIA 68 IS HENRY JACKSON LIKELY TO BELIEVE WE ARE TOO FRIENDLY WITH RUSSIA 69 IS FRED HARRIS LIKELY TO BELIEVE WE ARE TOO FRIENDLY WITH RUSSIA 70 IS JIMMY CARTER LIKELY TO BELIEVE WE ARE TOO FRIENDLY WITH RUSSIA 71 IS GERALD FORD LIKELY TO BELIEVE WE ARE TOO FRIENDLY WITH RUSSIA 72 IS GEORGE WALLACE LIKELY TO BELIEVE WE ARE TOO FRIENDLY WITH RUSSIA 73 IS RONALD REAGAN LIKELY TO FEEL TOO MUCH ATTENTION HAS BEEN PAID TO MINORITIES 74 IS MORRIS UDALL LIKELY TO FEEL TOO MUCH ATTENTION HAS BEEN PAID TO MINORITIES 75 IS SARGENT SHRIVER LIKELY TO FEEL TOO MUCH ATTENTION HAS BEEN PAID TO MINORITIES 76 IS BIRCH BAYH LIKELY TO FEEL TOO MUCH ATTENTION HAS BEEN PAID TO MINORITIES 77 IS HENRY JACKSON LIKELY TO FEEL TOO MUCH ATTENTION HAS BEEN PAID TO MINORITIES 78 IS FRED HARRIS LIKELY TO FEEL TOO MUCH ATTENTION HAS BEEN PAID TO MINORITIES 79 IS JIMMY CARTER LIKELY TO FEEL TOO MUCH ATTENTION HAS BEEN PAID TO MINORITIES 80 IS GERALD FORD LIKELY TO FEEL TOO MUCH ATTENTION HAS BEEN PAID TO MINORITIES 81 IS GEORGE WALLACE LIKELY TO FEEL TOO MUCH ATTENTION HAS BEEN PAID TO MINOROTIES R'S ASSESSMENT OF THE CANDIDATES 82 IS RONALD REAGAN MORE OF A LIBERAL A MODERATE OR A CONSERVATIVE 83 IS MORRIS UDALL MORE OF A LIBERAL A MODERATE OR A CONSERVATIVE 84 IS SARGENT SHRIVER MORE OF A LIBERAL A MODERATE OR A CONSERVATIVE 85 IS BIRCH BAYH MORE OF A LIBERAL A MODERATE OR A CONSERVATIVE 86 IS HENRY JACKSON MORE OF A LIBERAL A MODERATE OR A CONSERVATIVE 87 IS FRED HARRIS MORE OF A LIBERAL A MODERATE OR A CONSERVATIVE 88 IS JIMMY CARTER MORE OF A LIBERAL A MODERATE OR A CONSERVATIVE 89 IS GERALD FORD MORE OF A LIBERAL A MODERATE OR A CONSERVATIVE 90 IS GEORGE WALLACE MORE OF A LIBERAL A MODERATE OR A CONSERVATIVE 91 DOES RONALD REAGAN HAVE MORE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY THEN MOST 92 DOES MORRIS UDALL HAVE MORE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY THAN MOST 93 DOES SARGENT SHRIVER HAVE MORE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY THAN MOST 94 DOES BIRCH BAYH HAVE MORE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY THAN MOST 95 DOES HENRY JACKSON HAVE MORE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY THAN MOST 96 DOES FRED HARRIS HAVE MORE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY THAN MOST 97 DOES JIMMY CARTER HAVE MORE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY THAN MOST 98 DOES GERALD FORD HAVE MORE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY THAN MOST 99 DOES GEORGE WALLACE HAVE MORE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY THAN MOST 100 DOES RONALD REAGAN HAVE STRONG LEADERSHIP QUALITIES 101 DOES MORRIS UDALL HAVE STRONG LEADERSHIP QUALITIES 102 DOES SARGENT SHRIVER HAVE STRONG LEADERSHIP QUALITIES 103 DOES BIRCH BAYH HAVE STRONG LEADERSHIP QUALITIES 104 DOES HENRY JACKSON HAVE STRONG LEADERSHIP QUALITIES 105 DOES FRED HARRIS HAVE STRONG LEADERSHIP QUALITIES 106 DOES JIMMY CARTER HAVE STRONG LEADERSHIP QUALITIES 107 DOES GERALD FORD HAVE STRONG LEADERSHIP QUALITIES 108 DOES GEORGE WALLACE HAVE STRONG LEADERSHIP QUALITIES 109 IS RONALD REAGAN TOO EXTREME ON THE ISSUES 110 IS MORRIS UDALL TOO EXTREME ON THE ISSUES 111 IS SARGENT SHRIVER TOO EXTREME ON THE ISSUES 112 IS BIRCH BAYH TOO EXTREME ON THE ISSUES 113 IS HENRY JACKSON TOO EXTREME ON THE ISSUES 114 IS FRED HARRIS TOO EXTREME ON THE ISSUES 115 IS JIMMY CARTER TOO EXTREME ON THE ISSUES 116 IS GERALD FORD TOO EXTREME ON THE ISSUES 117 IS GEORGE WALLACE TOO EXTREME ON THE ISSUES 118 IS RONALD REAGAN VERY COMPETENT 119 IS MORRIS UDALL VERY COMPETENT 120 IS SARGENT SHRIVER VERY COMPETENT 121 IS BIRCH BAYH VERY COMPETENT 122 IS HENRY JACKSON VERY COMPETENT 123 IS FRED HARRIS VERY COMPETENT 124 IS JIMMY CARTER VERY COMPETENT 125 IS GERALD FORD VERY COMPETENT 126 IS GEORGE WALLACE VERY COMPETENT R'S CHOICE FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION 127 RESPONDENT'S FIRST CHOICE FOR THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION 128 RESPONDENT'S SECOND CHOICE FOR THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION 129 RESPONDENT'S THIRD CHOICE FOR THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION 130 RESPONDENT'S CHOICE FOR THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION 131 RESPONDENT'S FIRST CHOICE OF CANDIDATE RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION 132 RESPONDENT'S SECOND CHOICE OF CANDIDATE RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION 133 RESPONDENT'S THIRD CHOICE OF CANDIDATE RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION 134 WHICH OF THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES WILL BE THE STRONGEST AGAINST THE REPUBLICANS 135 STRONGEST DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE OTHER THAN KENNEDY OR HUMPHREY 136 DID RESPONDENT VOTE FOR NIXON OR MCGOVERN IN THE 1972 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 137 HOW CLOSE HAS RESPONDENT FOLLOWED THE PRIMARY ELECTION CAMPAIGNS 138 HOW MUCH OF THE TIME CAN RESPONDENT TRUST GOVERNMENT TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT 139 IS RESPONDENT LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE 140 DOES RESPONDENT LEAN TO THE LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE SIDE ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION 141 RESPONDENT'S LAST GRADE IN SCHOOL ATTENDED 142 RESPONDENT'S AGE 143 RESPONDENT'S RACE 144 RESPONDENT'S RELIGIOUS BACKGROUND 145 IS RESPONDENT CHIEF WAGE EARNER IN HOUSEHOLD 146 OCCUPATION OF CHIEF WAGE EARNER 147 IS ANYONE IN RESPONDENT'S HOUSEHOLD IN LABOR UNION ----------------------------------

• ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7660
• ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1
• ICPSR PART NUMBER-001
• RESPONDENT'S I D
• WEIGHT VARIABLE
• CBS REGION CODE
• CENSUS REGION CODE
• COMPLETED INTERVIEW
• R SELECTION KEY NUMBER
• SURVEY NUMBER
• # OF ADULTS IN HOUSEHOLD
• RESPONDENT'S SEX
• STATE CODE
• TELEPHONE NUMBER
• SELECTION STATUS
• 1 R THNK SLF REP/DEM/IND
• 1A IS R CLOSR TO REP/DEM
• 2A D/AGR GOV SEE TO JOBS
• 2B D/AGR NT INT FRD USSR
• 2C D/AGR ABRN LFT TO WMN
• 2D D/AGR TO MCH ATTN MIN
• 2E D/AGR REDC MILTY SPND
• 2F D/AGR GOV FAIL TO ACT
• 2G D/AGR GOV MST BAL BDG
• 2H D/AGR POLUT LAW RELAX
• 2I D/AGR RAC INTER ACHVD
• 2J D/AGR STE RUN GOV PRO
• 2J1 D/AGR STE FRE RN PRO
• 3.1 R'S IMPRESION REAGAN
• 3.2 R'S IMPRESSION UDALL
• 3.3 R'S IMPRESON SHRIVER
• 3.4 R'S IMPRESSION BAYH
• 3.5 R'S IMPRESON JACKSON
• 3.6 R'S IMPRESION HARRIS
• 3.7 R'S IMPRESION CARTER
• 4A UN/FAV OPINION REAGAN
• 4B UN/FAV OPINION UDALL
• 4C UN/FAV OPINON SHRIVER
• 4D UN/FAV OPINION BAYH
• 4E UN/FAV OPINON JACKSON
• 4F UN/FAV OPINION HARRIS
• 4G UN/FAV OPINION CARTER
• 4H UN/FAV OPINION FORD
• 4I UN/FAV OPINON WALLACE
• 4J U/FAV OPINON HUMPHREY
• 5.1 FAV BAL BUDGT/REAGAN
• 5.2 FAV BAL BUDGET UDALL
• 5.3 FAV BAL BUDGT SHRIVR
• 5.4 FAV BAL BUDGET BAYH
• 5.5 FAV BAL BUDGT JACKSN
• 5.6 FAV BAL BUDGT HARRIS
• 5.7 FAV BAL BUDGT CARTER
• 5.8 FAV BAL BUDGT FORD
• 5.9 FAV BAL BUDGT WALACE
• 6.1 FAV ABRTN LAW REAGAN
• 6.2 FAV ABRTN LAW UDALL
• 6.3 FAV ABRTN LAW SHRVER
• 6.4 FAV ABRTN LAW BAYH
• 6.5 FAV ABRTN LAW JACKSN
• 6.6 FAV ABRTN LAW HARRIS
• 6.7 FAV ABRTN LAW CARTER
• 6.8 FAV ABRTN LAW FORD
• 6.9 FAV ABRTN LAW WALACE
• 7.1 BLV 2 FR USSR REAGAN
• 7.2 BLV 2 FR USSR UDALL
• 7.3 BLV 2 FR USSR SHRVER
• 7.4 BLV 2 FR USSR BAYH
• 7.5 BLV 2 FR USSR JACKSN
• 7.6 BLV 2 FR USSR HARRIS
• 7.7 BLV 2 FR USSR CARTER
• 7.8 BLV 2 FR USSR FORD
• 7.9 BLV 2 FR USSR WALACE
• 8.1 2 MCH ATT MIN REAGAN
• 8.2 2 MCH ATT MIN UDALL
• 8.3 2 MCH ATT MIN SHRVER
• 8.4 2 MCH ATT MIN BAYH
• 8.5 2 MCH ATT MIN JACKSN
• 8.6 2 MCH ATT MIN HARRIS
• 8.7 2 MCH ATT MIN CARTER
• 8.8 2 MCH ATT MIN FORD
• 8.9 2 MCH ATT MIN WALACE
• 9.1 LIB/MDRAT/CON REAGAN
• 9.2 LIB/MDRAT/CON UDALL
• 9.3 LIB/MDRAT/CON SHRVER
• 9.4 LIB/MDRAT/CON BAYH
• 9.5 LIB/MDRAT/CON JACKSN
• 9.6 LIB/MDRAT/CON HARRIS
• 9.7 LIB/MDRAT/CON CARTER
• 9.8 LIB/MDRAT/CON FORD
• 9.9 LIB/MDRAT/CON WALACE
• 10A1 MRE HNST/NTG REAGAN
• 10A2 MRE HNST/NTG UDALL
• 10A3 MRE HNST/NTG SHRVER
• 10A4 MRE HNST/NTG BAYH
• 10A5 MRE HNST/NTG JACKSN
• 10A6 MRE HNST/NTG HARRIS
• 10A7 MRE HNST/NTG CARTER
• 10A8 MRE HNST/NTG FORD
• 10A9 MRE HNST/NTG WALACE
• 10B1 LEDRSHIP QLT REAGAN
• 10B2 LEDRSHIP QLT UDALL
• 10B3 LEDRSHIP QLT SHRVER
• 10B4 LEDRSHIP QLT BAYH
• 10B5 LEDRSHIP QLT JACKSN
• 10B6 LEDRSHIP QLT HARRIS
• 10B7 LEDRSHIP QLT CARTER
• 10B8 LEDRSHIP QLT FORD
• 10B9 LEDRSHIP QLT WALACE
• 10C1 EXT ON ISUES REAGAN
• 10C2 EXT ON ISUES UDALL
• 10C3 EXT ON ISUES SHRVER
• 10C4 EXT ON ISUES BAYH
• 10C5 EXT ON ISUES JACKSN
• 10C6 EXT ON ISUES HARRIS
• 10C7 EXT ON ISUES CARTER
• 10C8 EXT ON ISUES FORD
• 10C9 EXT ON ISUES WALACE
• 10D1 VRY COMPETNT REAGAN
• 10D2 VRY COMPETNT UDALL
• 10D3 VRY COMPETNT SHRVER
• 10D4 VRY COMPETNT BAYH
• 10D5 VRY COMPETNT JACKSN
• 10D6 VRY COMPETNT HARRIS
• 10D7 VRY COMPETNT CARTER
• 10D8 VRY COMPETNT FORD
• 10D9 VRY COMPETNT WALACE
• 11 1ST CHOIC DEM NMINTON
• 12 2ND CHOIC DEM NMINTON
• 13 3RD CHOIC DEM NMINTON
• 14 R PREFR REP NOMINATON
• 15 1ST CHO DEM/REP NOMIN
• 16 2ND CHO DEM/REP NOMIN
• 17 3RD CHO DEM/REP NOMIN
• 18 STRG DEM CAN AGST REP
• 18A O STRG CAN NOT EK/HH
• 19 72ELC R VTE NIX/MCGOV
• 20 HW CLS R FOL PRIM ELC
• 21 R TRUST GOVN DO RIGHT
• 22 IS R LIBERAL/CONSERVT
• 22A MOD LEANING LIB/CONV
• 23 LAST GRADE IN SCHOOL
• 24 RESPONDENT'S AGE
• 25 RESPONDENT'S RACE
• 26 R BACKGROUND RELIGION
• 27 IS R CHIEF WAGE ERNER
• 28 OCC CHIEF WAGE EARNER
• 29 ANY1 HSEHOLD IN UNION

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 3
End: 6
Record Segment No. 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 3
End: 6
Record Segment No. 2

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 3
End: 6
Record Segment No. 3

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 1
Width: 4

Variable Text: ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7660

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 7
End: 7
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 7
End: 7
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 2

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 7
End: 7
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 3

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 5
Width: 1

Variable Text: ICPSR EDITION NUMBER

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Notes: THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THE RELEASE EDITION OF THIS DATASET.

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 8
End: 10
Record Segment No. 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 8
End: 10
Record Segment No. 2

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 8
End: 10
Record Segment No. 3

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 6
Width: 3

Variable Text: ICPSR PART NUMBER

Range of Valid Data Values: 001-011

Notes: THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THIS PART OF A 11-PART STUDY.

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 11
End: 14
Record Segment No. 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 11
End: 14
Record Segment No. 2

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 11
End: 14
Record Segment No. 3

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 9
Width: 4

Variable Text: RESPONDENT'S I.D.

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 15
End: 18
Record Segment No. 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 15
End: 18
Record Segment No. 2

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 15
End: 18
Record Segment No. 3

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 13
Width: 4

Variable Text: WEIGHT VARIABLE

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 19
End: 19
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 17
Width: 1

Variable Text: CBS REGION CODE

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 20
End: 20
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 18
Width: 1

Variable Text: CENSUS REGION CODE

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 21
End: 21
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 19
Width: 1

Variable Text: COMPLETED INTERVIEW

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 22
End: 22
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 20
Width: 1

Variable Text: RESPONDENT SELECTION KEY NUMBER

Notes: ACTUAL NUMBER IS CODED. VALID-N=1459 MIN=1 MAX=6 MEAN=2.3 ST.DEV=1.8

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 23
End: 23
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 21
Width: 1

Variable Text: SURVEY NUMBER

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 24
End: 24
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 22
Width: 1

Variable Text: NUMBER OF ADULTS IN HOUSEHOLD

Notes: ACTUAL NUMBER IS CODED. VALID-N=1459 MIN=1 MAX=6 MEAN=2.4 ST.DEV=1.0

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 25
End: 25
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 23
Width: 1

Variable Text: SEX OF RESPONDENT

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 26
End: 27
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 24
Width: 2

Variable Text: STATE CODE

Notes: SEE NOTE(S) 1 CODE: 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 FREQ: 21 12 13 119 8 13 7 12 64 36 8 CODE: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 FREQ: 66 37 37 25 37 29 12 34 23 58 28 CODE: 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 FREQ: 16 19 20 19 7 5 45 11 99 24 2 CODE: 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 FREQ: 76 18 19 129 2 23 7 21 88 4 9 CODE: 47 48 49 50 51 FREQ: 40 21 13 20 4

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 28
End: 33
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 26
Width: 6

Variable Text: TELEPHONE NUMBER

Notes: THE FIRST THREE COLUMNS OF THIS VARIABLE CONTAIN THE AREA CODE OF THE RESPONDENT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER. THIS VARIABLE ORIGINALLY CONTAINED BOTH THE AREA CODE AND EXCHANGE OF THE RESPONDENT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER. FOR REASONS OF CONFIDENTIALITY THE EXCHANGE HAS BEEN SUPPRESSED, AND THE LAST THREE COLUMNS OF THE VARIABLE PADDED WITH MISSING DATA. THE ORIGINAL DATA IS MAINTAINED AT ICPSR; THE CONSORTIUM WILL DO TABULATIONS AND ANALYSIS WITH THIS DATA FOR ANY USER WHO REQUESTS IT.

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 34
End: 34
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 32
Width: 1

Variable Text: SELECTION STATUS

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 35
End: 35
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 33
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 36
End: 36
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 34
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 37
End: 37
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 35
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 38
End: 38
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 36
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 39
End: 39
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 37
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 40
End: 40
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 38
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 41
End: 41
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 39
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 42
End: 42
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 40
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 43
End: 43
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 41
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 44
End: 44
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 42
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 45
End: 45
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 43
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 46
End: 46
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 44
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 47
End: 47
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 45
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 48
End: 48
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 46
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 49
End: 49
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 47
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 50
End: 50
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 48
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 51
End: 51
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 49
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 52
End: 52
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 50
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 53
End: 53
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 51
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 54
End: 54
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 52
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 55
End: 55
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 53
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 56
End: 56
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 54
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 57
End: 57
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 55
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 58
End: 58
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 56
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 59
End: 59
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 57
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 60
End: 60
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 58
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 61
End: 61
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 59
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 62
End: 62
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 60
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 63
End: 63
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 61
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 64
End: 64
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 62
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 65
End: 65
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 63
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 66
End: 66
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 64
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 67
End: 67
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 65
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 68
End: 68
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 66
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 69
End: 69
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 67
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 70
End: 70
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 68
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 71
End: 71
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 69
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 72
End: 72
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 70
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 73
End: 73
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 71
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 74
End: 74
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 72
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 75
End: 75
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 73
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 76
End: 76
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 74
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 77
End: 77
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 75
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 78
End: 78
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 76
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 79
End: 79
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 77
Width: 1