CBS News/NEW YORK TIMES Election Surveys, 1976  (ICPSR 7660 )

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 3: Data Files Description
Part 4: Variable Description
Part 5: Other Study-Related Materials
Entire Codebook

CBS News/NEW YORK TIMES Election Surveys, 1976

7660

CBS News. THE NEW YORK TIMES.

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Copyright ICPSR, 2000

August, 31, 2000

Jon Brode's SISO script

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

August, 31, 2000

ICPSR XML Version

Jon Brode

CBS News/NEW YORK TIMES Election Surveys, 1976

7660

CBS News. THE NEW YORK TIMES.

CBS News/NEW YORK TIMES Election Surveys, 1976

7660

CBS News. THE NEW YORK TIMES.

CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES ELECTION SURVEYS, 1976 PART 4: MAY SURVEY (ICPSR 7660) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES FIRST ICPSR EDITION, 1981 FIRST PRINTING, 1981 INTER-UNIVERSTIY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH P.O. BOX 1248 ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48106 C 1981 THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AND THE ROPER PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH CENTER, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FIRST PUBLISHED, 1981 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS DO NOT APPLY TO MEMBER INSTITUTIONS OF THE ICPSR. ALL OR PART OF THIS CODEBOOK MAY BE REPRODUCED FOR USE AT MEMBER INSTITUTIONS WITH APPROPRIATE CITATION TO THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR AND THE ICPSR. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ASSISTANCE ALL MANUSCRIPTS USING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) USED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH. THE DATA FOR THE CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES ELECTION SURVEYS, 1976, WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY CBS NEWS AND THE NEW YORK TIMES. NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PAR- TICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT OR THESIS ABSTRACT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. INTRODUCTION SERIES DESCRIPTION I STUDY DESCRIPTION IV RELATED PUBLICATIONS IV SAMPLING INFORMATION V WEIGHTING AND FREQUENCIES INFORMATION VII CODEBOOK INFORMATION VIII PROCESSING INFORMATION XI FILE STRUCTURE XI VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST XII CODEBOOK 1 APPENDIX 36 I SERIES DESCRIPTION CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES ELECTION SURVEYS, 1976 CBS NEWS AND THE NEW YORK TIMES WERE EQUAL PARTNERS IN A SERIES OF ELECTION SURVEYS COVERING THE 1976 UNITED STATES PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN. THE ICPSR CITATION REFLECTS ONLY AN ALPHABELTICAL ARRANGEMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS. THE SURVEYS WERE INTENDED TO PROVIDE ANOTHER DIMENSION TO THE POLITICAL REPORTING OF THE TWO ORGANIZATIONS. THE SURVEYS, USING EXTENSIVE COVERAGE EARLY IN THE PRIMARY CAMPAIGN, WERE DESIGNED TO MONITOR THE PUBLIC'S CHANGING PERCEPTION OF THE CANDIDATES, THE ISSUES, AND THE CANDIDATES' POSITION VIS-A-VIS THE ISSUES. IT WAS THE INTENTION OF THE TWO NEWS ORGANIZATIONS TO REDUCE SPECULATION IN THEIR CAMPAIGN REPORTING ABOUT THE VOTING PUBLIC'S STATE OF MIND. TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF SURVEYS WERE CONDUCTED. THE FIRST WERE TEN SEPARATE TELEPHONE SURVEYS, EACH WITH AN AVERAGE OF 1500 RANDOMLY SELECTED ADULTS. FIVE SURVEYS WERE CONDUCTED MONTHLY FROM FEBRUARY THROUGH JUNE, FOUR MORE BETWEEN EARLY SEPTEMBER AND THE GENERAL ELECTION--ONE IN SEPTEMBER AND ONE FOLLOWING EACH PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE. A FINAL SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED TWO DAYS AFTER THE GENERAL ELECTION. THE SECOND SET OF SURVEYS WERE DONE ON THE DAY OF THE PRIMARY OR ELECTION. INTERVIEWS WERE CONDUCTED AT THE POLLING PLACE AMONG A RANDOM SAMPLE OF PEOPLE WHO HAD JUST VOTED IN EITHER THE DEMOCRATIC OR REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION. THESE SURVEYS WERE CONDUCTED IN THE FOLLOWING PRIMARY STATES: CALIFORNIA, FLORIDA, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW YORK, OHIO, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA AND WISCONSIN. ADDITIONALLY, FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, THERE WAS A NATIONWIDE ELECTION DAY SURVEY CONDUCTED AT THE POLLING PLACE WITH VOTERS THROUGHOUT THE NATION. RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED TO IDENTIFY THEIR POLITICAL PARTY PREFERENCE, THE CANDIDATE FOR WHOM THEY WOULD VOTE OR HAD VOTED IN PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN, THEIR ATTITUDES TOWARD NATIONAL ISSUES, THE ISSUES AND CANDIDATE CHARACTERISTICS THAT WERE IMPORTANT TO THEM IN THEIR CHOICE OF A CANDIDATE, AND SEVERAL DEMOGRAPHICS. II SERIES SAMPLING INFORMATION AND DATES OF INTERVIEWING NATIONAL SURVEYS SURVEY AND POPULATION IN SAMPLE REINTERVIEWS DATES OF SAMPLE SIZE INCLUDED INTERVIEWING IN TOTAL FEBRUARY ALL ADULTS 1458 (2/2-2/8) MARCH ALL ADULTS 1524 303 1ST (3/18-3/24) INTERVIEWED IN FEBRUARY APRIL ALL ADULTS 1464 354 1ST (4/10-4/15) INTERVIEWED IN MARCH MAY ALL ADULTS 1501 339 1ST (5/19-5/23) INTERVIEWED IN APRIL JUNE ALL ADULTS 1454 306 1ST (6/15-6/20) INTERVIEWED IN MAY 286 1ST INTERVIEWED IN FEBRUARY SEPTEMBER ALL ADULTS 1703 (8/29-9/5) DEBATE ONE ALL ADULTS 1167 ALL 1167 1ST (9/24-9/25) INTERVIEWED IN SEPTEMBER DEBATE TWO REGISTERED 1761 (10/8-10/12) ONLY DEBATE THREE REGISTERED 2025 (10/24-10/27) ONLY ELECTION DAY VOTERS ONLY 15,300 (NOV.2) POST-ELECTION ALL ADULTS 2042 1699 REGISTERED (11/4-11/8) 343 UNREGISTERED ALL 1ST INTERVIEWED AFTER DEBATE 3 III STATE PRIMARY DAY SURVEYS *IN THESE STATES REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS WERE SURVEYED WITH DIFFERENT QUESTIONNAIRES AND ARE CONTAINED IN SEPARATE DATA FILES. STATE AND TOTAL DEMOCRATS REPUBLICANS DATE OF INTERVIEW *CALIFORNIA 2411 1492 919 (JUNE 8) FLORIDA 1680 1166 514 (MARCH 9) ILLINOIS 1060 716 344 (MARCH 16) *INDIANA 1471 816 655 (MAY 4) MASSACHUSETTS 1093 783 211 (MARCH 2) *MICHIGAN 1840 838 1002 (MAY 18) NEW HAMPSHIRE 1235 561 674 (FEBRUARY 24) NEW YORK 1074 1074 --- (APRIL 6) *OHIO 1650 983 667 (JUNE 8) OREGON 2089 1262 827 (MAY 25) PENNSYLVANIA 1507 1507 --- (APRIL 27) WISCONSIN 1835 1014 821 (APRIL 6) IV STUDY DESCRIPTION - PART 4 MAY SURVEY THE MAY SURVEY WAS A NATIONWIDE SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TELEPHONE WITH 1501 ADULTS. RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED ABOUT THEIR PARTY IDENTIFICATION, PREFERRED PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, THEIR OPINIONS OF THE CANDIDATES' POSITIONS, THE REASONS FOR THEIR CHOICE OF PREFERRED CANDIDATE, AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON EDUCATION, AGE, RACE, RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION, OCCUPATION AND INCOME. THERE ARE 339 RESPONDENTS WHO WERE FIRST INTERVIEWED IN THE APRIL SURVEY AND REINTERVIEWED IN THE MAY SURVEY. THIS DATASET CONTAINS 89 VARIABLES. RELATED PUBLICATIONS CHARLES H.BACKSTROM AND GERALD D. HURSH, SURVEY RESEARCH. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1963. JOSEPH WAKSBERG, "SAMPLING METHODS FOR RANDOM-DIGIT DIALING," JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, VOL. 73 (MARCH, 1978) 40-46. V SAMPLING INFORMATION THE INDIVIDUALS COMPRISING THE SAMPLE IN THE CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES NATIONWIDE TELEPHONE SURVEYS WERE SELECTED THROUGH A VARIATION OF RANDOM-DIGIT DIALING TECHNIQUES USING A PROCEDURE DESIGNED BY WARREN J. MITOFSKY IN 1970 FOR CBS NEWS SURVEYS. THE OPTIMIZATION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS DONE BY JOSEPH WAKSBERG AND IS DESCRIBED IN THE RECENT PUBLICATION "SAMPLING METHODS FOR RAMDOM-DIGIT DIALING," JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION. (VOL.73) MARCH, 1978, PP. 40-46. PRIMARY SAMPLING UNITS (PSU'S) ARE BLOCKS OF 100 TELEPHONE NUMBERS, IDENTICAL THROUGH THE EIGHTH DIGIT (AREA CODE-EXCHANGE-XX__). THE PSU'S WERE STRATIFIED BY GEOGRAPHIC REGION, AREA CODE AND SIZE OF PLACE. FOUR SIZE OF PLACE STRATA WERE CRUDELY DETERMINED BY USING THE GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES OF THE PLACES WHERE THE CENTRAL OFFICES ARE LOCATED. THESE COORDINATES ARE ASSIGNED BY THE PHONE COMPANY TO EVERY EXCHANGE. ALL EXCHANGES IN THE SAME CITY WOULD HAVE THE SAME COORDINATES. LARGE AND SMALL CITY STRATA WERE DEFINED BY COUNTING THE NUMBER OF EXCHANGES PER PAIR OF COORDINATES. SUBURBS ARE EXCHANGES WITHIN 15 MILES OF LARGE CITIES. THE LAST STRATUM INCLUDES THE REMAINING EXCHANGES. THE NUMBER OF WORKING RESIDENTIAL PHONE NUMBERS PER EXCHANGE VARIES CONSIDERABLY BY STRATUM. THE FIRST STAGE SELECTION WAS SYSTEMATIC WITH A UNIFORM RATE, FROM A COMPLETE LIST OF ALL EXISTING AREA CODES AND EXCHANGES IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES. THE LAST TWO DIGITS WERE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED WITHIN EACH PSU. THE NUMBER WAS CALLED FOR A SCREENING INTERVIEW. IF IT WAS A WORKING RESIDENTIAL NUMBER, THE PSU (I.E., THE BLOCK OF 100 TELEPHONE NUMBERS) WAS RETAINED IN THE SAMPLE. THREE RESIDENCES WERE TO BE CONTACTED WITHIN A PSU FOR EACH SURVEY. THE ACTUAL TELEPHONE NUMBERS FOR EACH SURVEY WERE SELECTED IN SMALL GROUPS (REPLICATES), TO PERMIT VARYING SAMPLE SIZES, WHILE STILL RETAINING GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION. THE INITIAL SCREENING OF A PSU TAKES ADVANTAGE OF THE TELEPHONE COMPANY'S PRACTICE OF ASSIGNING WORKING TELEPHONE NUMBERS IN BLOCKS OF 100'S OR 1000'S BEFORE STARTING A NEW BLOCK. THE DESIGN IS SELF-WEIGHTING, AS THE LIKELIHOOD OF AN EIGHT DIGIT GROUP OR "BLOCK" BEING SELECTED AS A PSU IS EXACTLY PROPORTIONAL TO THE NUMBER OF WORKING NUMBERS IN THE BLOCK. VI RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED WITHIN HOUSEHOLD USING A METHOD DEVELOPED BY KISH, AND MODIFIED BY BACKSTROM AND HURSH. (CHARLES H. BACKSTROM AND GERALD D. HURSH, SURVEY RESEARCH. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PRESS, 1963, PP. 52-58.) THE PROBABILITY OF SELECTION DEPENDS ON THE SIZE OF HOUSEHOLD. THE PROCEDURE PROVIDES AN UNBIASED SELECTION OF HOUSEHOLDS OF FEWER THAN FIVE ADULTS. THE RESPONDENT SELECTION CONTROLS FOR SEX AND THE RELATIVE AGE COMPOSITION OF THE HOUSEHOLD. IN THE MONTHLY SURVEYS CONDUCTED BETWEEN FEBRUARY AND JUNE, AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO REINTERVIEW RESPONDENTS FROM PRIOR SURVEYS. HALF OF EACH SAMPLE WAS TO INCLUDE A RANDOMLY-SELECTED HALF SAMPLE OF RESPONDENTS FROM THE PRIOR MONTH. THE MAY SAMPLE CONTAINS 339 PERSONS FIRST INTERVIEWED IN APRIL. THE REINTERVIEWED RESPONDENTS FROM APRIL REPRESENT THE RESULTS OF SUCCESSFUL RECONTACT FROM A RANDOMLY SELECTED HALF-SAMPLE OF PRIOR RESPONDENTS. THE REINTERVIEWED RESPONDENTS, WHO COMPRISE LESS THAN HALF OF THE CASES IN THE SURVEY DATASET, ARE NOT SEPARATELY IDENTIFIED. THE MAY SURVEY INCLUDES AN OVERSAMPLING OF REPUBLICANS TO INSURE THAT THE NUMBER OF REPUBLICANS WOULD BE LARGE ENOUGH FOR RELIABLE ANALYSIS. TO DO THIS, ADDITIONAL RANDOM REPLICATES BEYOND THOSE USED TO OBTAIN THE ORIGINAL SAMPLE WERE INCLUDED. IN THESE ADDITIONAL REPLICATES, ONLY REPUBLICAN RESPONDENTS WERE INTERVIEWED. RESPONDENTS ARE IDENTIFIED AS HAVING BEEN SELECTED AS PART OF THE ADDITIONAL SAMPLE OF REPUBLICANS BY A CODE IN VARIABLE 16 OF THE SURVEY. THE ENTIRE SAMPLE IS WEIGHTED TO REFLECT THE ACTUAL PROBABILITY OF SELECTION, INCLUDING THIS OVER SAMPLING. VII WEIGHTING AND FREQUENCIES INFORMATION THE STUDY CONTAINS A WEIGHT VARIABLE (V5) WHICH MUST BE USED IN ANY DATA ANALYSIS. THERE ARE THREE IMPLIED DECIMAL PLACES IN THE WEIGHT VARIABLE. THE FREQUENCIES WHICH APPEAR IN THE CODEBOOK NEXT TO THE CODE VALUES FOR EACH VARIABLE ARE WEIGHTED. DECIMAL PLACES IN THESE FREQUENCIES HAVE BEEN ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER. THE WEIGHT ASSIGNED TO EACH RESPONDENT IS THE INVERSE OF THE PROBABILITY OF SELECTION, MODIFIED BY A SERIES OF RATIO ESTIMATES. THE FIRST STAGE IS ESSENTIALLY A NON-INTERVIEW ADJUSTMENT WITHIN GEOGRAPHIC REGION. FOR EACH REGION, AN ADJUSTMENT WAS MADE TO APPROXIMATE THE NUMBER OF ADULTS IN THE REGION. IN THE NEXT STAGE, RACE BY SEX WERE THE RATIO ESTIMATE CHARACTERISTICS, AND THE FINAL STAGE WAS AGE BY EDUCATION. (ON OCCASION, BECAUSE OF A SMALL NUMBER OF SAMPLE CASES IN SOME CELLS AT THE FINAL STAGE, SOME EDUCATIONAL GROUPS WERE COLLAPSED WITHIN AGE CATEGORIES.) THE WEIGHTS COMPUTED IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED ARE THE DIMENSION OF THE ADULT POPULATIN OF THE UNITED STATES. FOR CONVENIENCE, ALL WEIGHTS WERE REDUCED BY A CONSTANT SO THAT THE RESULTING SUM OF THE WEIGHTS IS THE SAMPLE SIZE. A WEIGHT IS ASSIGNED TO EACH SAMPLE RECORD, AND MUST BE USED FOR ALL TABULATIONS. IN THE MONTHLY SURVEYS WHICH INCLUDED REINTERVIEWS WITH RESPONDENTS FROM PREVIOUS MONTHS' SAMPLES, (MARCH, APRIL, MAY, AND JUNE), THE ENTIRE FILE, INCLUDING THE REINTERVIEWED RESPONDENTS, WAS WEIGHTED USING THE METHOD DESCRIBED ABOVE. IN THE JUNE SURVEY THESE WEIGHTS WERE THEN ASSIGNED TO THE RESPONDENTS BEING INTERVIEWED FOR THE FIRST TIME, WHILE REINTERVIEWED RESPONDENTS WERE GIVEN THE WEIGHTS THEY HAD BEEN ASSIGNED IN THEIR ORIGINAL SAMPLE. VIII CODEBOOK INFORMATION THE EXAMPLE BELOW ILLUSTRATES THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE CODEBOOK FOR A TYPICAL VARIABLE. THE NUMBERS IN CIRCLES DO NOT APPEAR IN THE CODEBOOK, BUT REFER TO THE EXPLANATIONS WHICH FOLLOW THIS EXAMPLE. ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 VAR 22 2 5A MST IMPT REP POL ISSU 3 MD=0 OR GE 7 REF 22 4 LOC 39 WIDTH 1 5 ----------- 6 ----------- 7 Q.5A. NOW LETS TALK ABOUT POLITICAL ISSUES. VOTERS TELL US CERTAIN ISSUES ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN OTHERS. WHICH ONE OF (NAME OF CANDIDATE FROM Q.2) POSITIONS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT REASON WHY YOU CHOSE HIM? (INTERVIEWER: READ ENTIRE LIST, RECORD ONE ANSWER ONLY) 8 ----------------------------------- 9 ----------------------------------- 10 11 12 56 1. HE'LL REDUCE THE SIZE OF GOVERNMENT 206 2. HE'LL DEAL MORE EFFECTIVELY WITH THE ECONOMY 30 3. HE'S LESS LIKELY TO SPLIT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 44 4. HE WON'T LET US FALL BEHIND RUSSIA 80 5. HE'LL CLEAN UP THE WELFARE SITUATION 136 6. HE'S LESS LIKELY TO GET US INTO A WAR 824 0. INAP., CODED 2 IN Q.1; CODED 6,8 OR 9 IN Q.2; SHOULD HAVE BEEN CODED INAP BUT WAS NOT 36 7. NONE OF THESE 31 8. DK 11 9. NO ANSWER, REFUSED; ERRONEOUSLY CODED INAP ........................................................... 1. INDICATES THE VARIABLE AND REFERENCE NUMBERS. A VARI- ABLE AND A REFERENCE NUMBER ARE ASSIGNED TO EACH ITEM IN THE STUDY. IN THIS CODEBOOK, WHICH DOCUMENTS THE ARCHIVED DATASET, THESE NUMBERS ARE IDENTICAL. SHOULD THE DATA BE SUBSET OR REARRANGED BY AN OSIRIS PROGRAM (E.G., MMP TO INTERSPERSE DATA FROM ANOTHER SOURCE, OR TCOT TO PRODUCE AN ANALYSIS DECK), THE VARIABLE NUMBERS WOULD CHANGE TO REFLECT THE ORDER OF THE NEW DATASET, WHILE THE REFERENCE NUMBERS WOULD REMAIN UNCHANGED TO REFLECT THE VARIABLE NUMBER IN THE CODEBOOK DESCRIBING THE ARCHIVED DATASET. IX 2. INDICATES THE ABBREVIATED VARIABLE NAME (MAXIMUM OF 24 CHARACTERS) USED IN THE OSIRIS SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY THE VARIABLE FOR THE USER. AN EXPANDED VERSION OF THE VARIABLE NAME CAN BE FOUND IN THE VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST. THE QUESTION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE VARIABLE APPEARS AT THE BEGINING OF THE VARIABLE NAME. 3. INDICATES THE CODE VALUES OF MISSING DATA. IN THIS EXAMPLE, CODE VALUES EQUAL TO ZERO AND THOSE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO SEVEN ARE MISSING DATA (MD=0 OR GE 7). ALTERNATIVE STATEMENTS FOR OTHER VARIABLES ARE "MD=0", "MD=9", OR "NO MISSING DATA CODES". SOME ANALYSIS SOFTWARE PACKAGES (INCLUDING THE OSIRIS SOFTWARE PACKAGE) REQUIRE THAT CERTAIN TYPES OF DATA WHICH THE USER DESIRES TO EXCLUDE FROM ANALYSIS CAN BE DESIGNATED AS "MISSING DATA", E.G., INAPPROPRIATE, UNASCERTAINED, UNASCERTAINABLE OR AMBIGOUS DATA CATEGORIES. ALTHOUGH THESE CODES ARE DEFINED AS MISSING DATA CATEGORIES, THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE USER SHOULD NOT OR CANNOT USE THEM IN A SUBSTANTIVE ROLE IF SO DESIRED. 4. INDICATES THE STARTING LOCATION AND WIDTH OF THIS VARI- ABLE WHEN THE DATA ARE STORED ON A MAGNETIC TAPE IN THE OSIRIS FORMAT. IF THE VARIABLE IS OF A MULTIPLE- RESPONSE TYPE, THE WIDTH REFERENCED IS THAT OF A SINGLE RESPONSE. 5. INDICATES THE LOCATION BY DECK AND COLUMN(S) OF THIS VARIABLE WHEN THE DATA ARE ON CARDS OR IN A CARD-IMAGE FORMAT (EITHER 80- OR 84-COLUMN FORMAT). 6. A VARIABLE CONTAINING DATA WITH IMPLIED DECIMALS IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE "XX DEC PLACE(S)", WHERE XX IS THE NUMBER OF DECIMAL PLACES IMPLIED (NOT PUNCHED) IN THE VARIABLE. 7. THIS IS THE FULL TEXT (QUESTION) SUPPLIED BY THE INVESTIGATOR TO DESCRIBE THE VARIABLE. THE QUESTION TEXT REFLECTS THE ORIGINAL WORDING OF THE QUESTION- NAIRE ITEM. 8. INDICATES AN ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR EXPLANATION APPENDED TO THE VARIABLE DESCRIPTION. X 9. A VARIABLE WHICH HAS A FOOTNOTE ASSOCIATED WITH IT IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE "SEE NOTE(S) X", WHERE X IS THE NUMBER OF THE FOOTNOTE REFERENCED. 10. INDICATES THE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF EACH CODE VALUE FOR THIS VARIABLE. 11. INDICATES THE CODE VALUES OCCURRING IN THE DATA FOR THIS VARIABLE; WHERE RANGES OF VALUES ARE INDICATED BY ..., THE "..." DO NOT APPEAR IN THE DATA. 12. INDICATES THE TEXTUAL DEFINITIONS OF THE CODES. ABBREVIATIONS COMMONLY USED IN THE CODE DEFINITIONS ARE "DK" (DON'T KNOW), "NA" (NOT ASCERTAINED), AND "INAP" (INAPPROPRIATE). THE PHRASES "SHOULD HAVE BEEN CODED INAP BUT WAS NOT" AND "ERRONEOUSLY CODED INAP," WHICH APPEAR FREQUENTLY IN THE "INAP" AND "NO ANSWER" CODE DEFINITIONS, REFLECT RECODING THAT WAS DONE TO THE ORIGINAL DATA TO ACHIEVE CONSISTENCY. RESPONDENTS WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN CODED "INAP" BUT WERE NOT HAVE BEEN RECODED TO "INAP", AND THOSE WHO WERE CODED "INAP" BUT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN HAVE BEEN RECODED TO THE "NO ANSWER" CATEGORY. XI PROCESSING INFORMATION THIS STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD ICPSR PROCEDURES. THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR INCONSISTENT CODES, ILLEGAL CODES AND BLANKS WHICH, WHENEVER FOUND, WERE CORRECTED BY RECODING TO THE APPROPRIATE MISSING DATA CATEGORIES. THE PHRASES "SHOULD HAVE BEEN CODED INAP BUT WAS NOT" AND "ERRONEOULSY CODED INAP," WHICH APPEAR FREQUENTLY IN THE "INAP" AND "NO ANSWER" CODE DEFINITIONS, REFLECT RECODING THAT WAS DONE TO THE ORIGINAL DATA TO ACHIEVE CONSISTENCY. RESPONDENTS WHO SHOULD HAVE BEEN CODED "INAP" BUT WERE NOT HAVE BEEN RECODED TO "INAP", AND THOSE WHO WERE CODED "INAP" BUT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN HAVE BEEN RECODED TO THE "NO ANSWER" CATEGORY. STATEMENTS BRACKETED IN "(" AND ")" SIGNS IN THE BODY OF THE CODEBOOK AND THE FOOTNOTES WERE ADDED BY THE PROCESSORS FOR EXPLANATORY PURPOSES. FILE STRUCTURE THE DATA ARE AVAILABLE FROM ICPSR IN TWO FORMATS: A CARD-IMAGE FILE AND AN OSIRIS DATASET. THE CARD-IMAGE FILE CONTAINS 2 DECKS PER RESPONDENT ON 80-COLUMN PUNCHED CARDS. THE DATA ARE SORTED BY RESPONDENT NUMBER WITH ALL DECKS (CARDS) FOR EACH CASE TOGETHER IN ASCENDING ORDER. THERE ARE TWO COMPONENTS TO THE OSIRIS DATASET. THE OSIRIS DICTIONARY CONTAINS ALL TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR EACH VARIABLE IN THE OSIRIS DATAFILE. THE DICTIONARY OR DICTIONARY-CODEBOOK FILE IS USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OSIRIS SOFTWARE PACKAGE. THE OSIRIS DATA FILE IS A SINGLE LOGICAL RECORD OF 106 BYTES FOR EACH RESPONDENT. THERE ARE 89 VARIABLES IN THE DATASET. THE OSIRIS DATA FILE CAN BE ACCESSED DIRECTLY BY SOFTWARE PACKAGES WHICH DO NOT USE THE OSIRIS DICTIONARY BY SPECIFYING THE TAPE LOCATIONS OF THE DESIRED VARIABLES. TAPE LOCATIONS ARE PROVIDED IN THIS CODEBOOK. XII VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST VAR. NO. STUDY INFORMATION 1 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7660 2 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1 3 ICPSR PART NUMBER-004 4 RESPONDENT'S I.D. 5 WEIGHT VARIABLE BACKGROUND AND CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION 6 CBS REGION CODE 7 CENSUS REGION CODE 8 COMPLETED INTERVIEW 9 RESPONDENT SELECTION KEY NUMBER 10 SURVEY NUMBER 11 NUMBER OF ADULTS IN HOUSEHOLD 12 RESPONDENT'S SEX 13 STATE CODE 14 TELEPHONE NUMBER 15 SIZE OF PLACE CODE 16 SELECTION STATUS 17 DOES RESPONDENT THINK OF SELF AS A REPUBLICAN OR A DEMOCRAT R'S ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES 18 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: GOVERNMENT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS FOR THOSE WHO WANT ONE 19 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: IT IS NOT IN U.S. INTEREST TO BE SO FRIENDLY WITH USSR 20 RESPONDENT DIS/SGREE: MOST WELFARE PROGRAMS SHOULD BE ELIMINATED 21 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: GOVERNMENT HAS PAID TOO MUCH ATTENTION TO MINORITIES 22 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: GOVERNMENT MUST HAVE MORE BALANCED BUDGET 23 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: REACH AGREEMENT WITH USSR TO CONTROL ARMS RACE 24 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: WE SHOULD ELECT A NON-WASHINGTON POLITICIAN 25 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: CONTROL OF PANAMA CANAL RETURNED TO PANAMA GOVERNMENT 26 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: IN THE LONG RUN, WAS IT RIGHT TO PARDON NIXON 27 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: GEORGE WALLACE EXPRESSES RESPONDENT'S FEELINGS ON ISSUES 28 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: JIMMY CARTER'S POSITION ON ISSUES TOO FUZZY 29 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: HUMPHREY SHOULD HAVE RUN IN PRIMARIES FOR DEM NOMINATION 30 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: JIMMY CARTER IS LIKE OTHER POLITICIANS. 31 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: KISSINGER SHOULD BE REPLACED AS SECRETARY OF STATE 32 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: GOVERNMENT IS WRONG TO LET U.S. FALL BEHIND USSR 33 RESPONDENT DIS/AGREE: WATERGATE REPRESENTS A LOT IS STILL WRONG WITH GOVERNMENT 34 SHOULD GOVERNMENT SPENDING FOR HEALTH AND EDUCATION BE REDUCED OR INCREASED 35 DOES RESPONDENT THINK THE ECONOMY IS IMPROVING 36 IS RESPONDENT DIS/SATISFIED WITH THE WAY THE ECONOMY IS GOING 37 SHOULD GOVERNMENT MILITARY SPENDING BE REDUCED OR INCREASED 38 RESPONDENT RATHER SMALLER GOVERNMENT LESS SERVICE/LARGER GOVERNMENT MORE SERVICE 39 CANDIDATE APPEAL: DEAL WITH MAJOR NATIONAL PROBLEMS/RESTORE MORAL VALUES R'S ASSESSMENT OF THE CANDIDATES 40 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF: RONALD REAGAN 41 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF: JIMMY CARTER 42 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF: GERALD FORD 43 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF: GEORGE WALLACE 44 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF: HUBERT HUMPHREY 45 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF: FRANK CHURCH 46 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF: JERRY BROWN 47 RESPONDENT'S UN/FAVORABLE OPINION OF: MORRIS UDALL R'S CANDIDATE PREFERENCE 48 WHO DID RESPONDENT VOTE FOR IN THE 1972 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: NIXON/MCGOVERN 49 IS RESPONDENT REGISTERED TO VOTE 50 WHICH PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WOULD RESPONDENT VOTE: GERALD FORD/HUBERT HUMPHREY 51 WHICH PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WOULD RESPONDENT VOTE: RONALD REAGAN/JERRY BROWN 52 WHICH PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WOULD RESPONDENT VOTE: GERALD FORD/JIMMY CARTER 53 WHICH PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WOULD RESPONDENT VOTE: REAGAN/HUBERT HUMPHREY 54 WHICH PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WOULD RESPONDENT VOTE: GERALD FORD/JERRY BROWN 55 WHICH PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WOULD RESPONDENT VOTE: RONALD REAGAN/JIMMY CARTER 56 WHICH PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WOULD RESPONDENT VOTE: GERALD FORD/FRANK CHURCH 57 WHICH PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE WOULD RESPONDENT VOTE: GERALD FORD/MORRIS UDALL 58 PREFERED REPUBLICAN FOR NOMINATION: RONALD REAGAN/GERALD FORD R'S REASON FOR CANDIDATE PREFERENCE 59 REASON FOR CHOOSING CANDIDATE: HE HAS BEST CHANCE OF WINNING 60 REASON FOR CHOOSING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: HE'S THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS 61 REASON FOR CHOOSING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: HE IS HONEST AND CAN BE TRUSTED 62 REASON FOR CHOOSING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: SEEMS A VERY COMPETENT PERSON 63 REASON FOR CHOOSING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: HE'S RESPONSIBLE AND NOT TOO EXTREME 64 REASON FOR CHOOSING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: NOT PART OF CROWD RUNNING THINGS NOW 65 REASON FOR CHOOSING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: HE WILL COMMAND WORLD RESPECT 66 REASON FOR CHOOSING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: PROMOTE COUNTRY'S ECONOMIC RECOVERY 67 REASON FOR CHOOSING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: REDUCE SIZE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 68 REASON FOR CHOOSING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: DEAL EFFECTIVELY ECONOMIC PROBLEMS 69 PREFERED DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION 70 IF THE RACE WERE BETWEEN HUMPHREY AND CARTER WHO WOULD RESPONDENT PREFER 71 REASON DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE PREFERED: DOESN'T SAY ONE THING TODAY OTHER TOMORROW 72 REASON DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IS PREFERED: HE HAS THE BEST CHANCE OF WINNING 73 REASON DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IS PREFERED: HE'S THE LESSER OF TWO EVILS 74 REASON DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IS PREFERED: HE'S HONEST AND CAN BE TRUSTED 75 REASON DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IS PREFERED: NOT PART OF CROWD RUNNING THINGS NOW 76 REASON DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IS PREFERED: HE'LL COMMAND RESPECT AROUND WORLD 77 REASON DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IS PREFERED: HE'LL REDUCE SIZE OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 78 REASON DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IS PREFERED: HE'LL AID THE CITIES 79 REASON DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IS PREFERED: HE'LL PROTECT INTERESTS OF LABOR 80 REASON DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IS PREFERED: HE'LL DEAL EFFECTIVELY WITH ECONOMY ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION 81 HOW MANY TIMES DOES RESPONDENT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES 82 ARE RESPONDENT'S POLITICAL VIEWS LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE 83 RESPONDENT'S LAST ATTENDED GRADE IN SCHOOL 84 RESPONDENT'S AGE 85 RESPONDENT'S RACE 86 RESPONDENT'S RELIGIOUS BACKGROUND 87 WHAT IS THE OCCUPATION OF HOUSEHOLD'S CHIEF WAGE EARNER 88 DOES ANYONE IN RESPONDENT'S HOUSEHOLD BELONG TO LABOR UNION 89 TOTAL FAMILY INCOME FOR 1975 ----------------------------------

• ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7660
• ICPSR EDITION NUMBER-1
• ICPSR PART NUMBER-004
• RESPONDENT'S I.D.
• WEIGHT VARIABLE
• CBS REGION CODE
• CENSUS REGION CODE
• COMPLETED INTERVIEW
• R SELECTION KEY NUMBER
• SURVEY NUMBER
• # OF ADULTS IN HOUSEHOLD
• R'S SEX
• STATE CODE
• TELEPHONE NUMBER
• SIZE OF PLACE CODE
• SELECTION STATUS
• 1 R THNK SLF REP/DEM/IND
• 2A D/AGR GOV SEE TO JOBS
• 2B D/AGR B SO FRDLY USSR
• 2C D/AGR ELMNATE WELFARE
• 2D D/AGR GOV TO ATT MINO
• 2E D/AGR GOV MRE BAL BDG
• 2F D/AGR CNTRL ARMS RACE
• 2G D/AGR ELT NON-WSH POL
• 2H D/AGR PNAMA CNTR CANL
• 2I D/AGR RGHT PARDON NIX
• 2J WAL EXP R FEL ON ISSU
• 2K D/AGR CRTR PSTN FUZZY
• 2L D/AGR HH DEM RUN PRIM
• 2M D/AGR CRTR LK OTH POL
• 2N D/AGR KSNGR BE RPLACD
• 2O D/AGR WR FL BHND USSR
• 2P D/AGR WTRGTE WRNG GOV
• 3A GOV SPDNG BE RED/INCR
• 3B IS ECONOMY IMPROVING
• 3C DIS/SAT WITH ECONOMY
• 3D GOV MIL SPND RED/INCR
• 3E SML/LRG GOV MR/LS SEV
• 3F CAN NAT PRBL/MRAL VAL
• 4A UN/FAVR RONALD REAGAN
• 4B UN/FAV JIMMY CARTER
• 4C UN/FAV GERALD FORD
• 4D UN/FAV GEORGE WALLACE
• 4E UN/FAV HUBERT HUMPHRY
• 4F UN/FAVR FRANK CHURCH
• 4G UN/FAVR JERRY BROWN
• 4H UN/FAVR MORRIS UDALL
• 5 R VOTE 72 ELC NIX/MCGN
• 6 IS R REGISTERD TO VOTE
• 7A R VOTE PRES CAN GF/HH
• 7B R VOTE PRES CAN RR/JB
• 7C R VOTE PRES CAN GF/JC
• 7D R VOTE PRES CAN RR/HH
• 7E R VOTE PRES CAN GF/JB
• 7F R VOTE PRES CAN RR/JC
• 7G R VOTE PRES CAN GF/FC
• 7H R VOTE PRES CAN GF/MU
• 8 PRE REP CAN REGAN/FORD
• 9A CAND HS CHANCE TO WIN
• 9B LESSER OF TWO EVILS
• 9C HONEST-CAN BE TRUSTED
• 9D CAND COMPETENT PERSON
• 9E RESPONSBLE NOT EXTREM
• 9F NOT PART OF NOW CROWD
• 9G COMMAND WORLD RESPECT
• 9H PROMOTE ECOMIC RECVRY
• 9I REDUCE SIZE FEDRL GOV
• 9J DEAL EFFTVLY ECON PLM
• 10 DEMOCRAT CAND PREFERD
• 11 R PREFER CRTER/HUMPHY
• 12A NO SAY TODY OTH TMRW
• 12B BEST CHANCE TO WIN
• 12C LESSER OF TWO EVILS
• 12D HE'S HONEST B TRUSTD
• 12E NOT PRT OF CROWD NOW
• 12F COMMD RESPCT FR WRLD
• 12G REDCE SIZE FEDRL GOV
• 12H HE'LL AID THE CITIES
• 12I PROTCT INTRSTS LABOR
• 12J DEAL EFFTV ECONO PBL
• 12AB # ATTD RELG SERVICS
• 13 R VIEWS LIBERAL/CONSV
• 14 LAST SCHL GRADE ATTND
• 15 RESPONDENT'S AGE
• 16 RESPONDENT'S RACE
• 17 R RELIGIOUS BACKGRUND
• 18 OCC CHIEF WAGE EARNER
• 19 ANY1 HSEHLD LABR UNON
• 20 TOTAL 75 FAMILY INCOM

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 3
End: 6
Record Segment No. 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 3
End: 6
Record Segment No. 2

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 1
Width: 4

Variable Text: ICPSR STUDY NUMBER-7660

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 7
End: 7
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 7
End: 7
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 2

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 5
Width: 1

Variable Text: ICPSR EDITION NUMBER

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

Notes: THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THE RELEASE EDITION OF THIS DATASET.

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 8
End: 10
Record Segment No. 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 8
End: 10
Record Segment No. 2

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 6
Width: 3

Variable Text: ICPSR PART NUMBER

Range of Valid Data Values: 001-011

Notes: THE NUMBER IDENTIFYING THIS PART OF A 11-PART STUDY.

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 11
End: 14
Record Segment No. 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 11
End: 14
Record Segment No. 2

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 9
Width: 4

Variable Text: RESPONDENT'S I.D.

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 15
End: 18
Record Segment No. 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 15
End: 18
Record Segment No. 2

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 13
Width: 4

Variable Text: WEIGHT VARIABLE

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 19
End: 19
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 17
Width: 1

Variable Text: CBS REGION CODE

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 20
End: 20
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 18
Width: 1

Variable Text: CENSUS REGION CODE

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 21
End: 21
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 19
Width: 1

Variable Text: COMPLETED INTERVIEW

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 22
End: 22
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 20
Width: 1

Variable Text: RESPONDENT SELECTION KEY NUMBER

Notes: ACTUAL NUMBER IS CODED. VALID-N=1501 MIN=1 MAX=6 MEAN=3.4 ST.DEV=1.7

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 23
End: 23
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 21
Width: 1

Variable Text: SURVEY NUMBER

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-5

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 24
End: 24
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 22
Width: 1

Variable Text: NUMBER OF ADULTS IN HOUSEHOLD

Notes: ACTUAL NUMBER IS CODED. VALID-N=1501 MIN=1 MAX=6 MEAN=2.5 ST.DEV=1.1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 25
End: 25
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 23
Width: 1

Variable Text: SEX OF RESPONDENT

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 26
End: 27
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 24
Width: 2

Variable Text: STATE CODE

Notes: SEE NOTE(S) 1 CODE: 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 FREQ: 23 12 12 108 6 15 2 7 77 42 8 CODE: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 FREQ: 100 32 22 21 32 31 6 40 46 51 33 CODE: 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 36 FREQ: 19 28 19 21 2 7 61 10 90 25 77 CODE: 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 FREQ: 13 15 123 5 32 6 31 64 8 13 38 CODE: 48 49 50 51 FREQ: 29 10 23 4

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 28
End: 33
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 26
Width: 6

Variable Text: TELEPHONE NUMBER

Notes: THE FIRST THREE COLUMNS OF THIS VARIABLE CONTAIN THE AREA CODE OF THE RESPONDENT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER. THIS VARIABLE ORIGINALLY CONTAINED BOTH THE AREA CODE AND EXCHANGE OF THE RESPONDENT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER. FOR REASONS OF CONFIDENTIALITY THE EXCHANGE HAS BEEN SUPPRESSED, AND THE LAST THREE COLUMNS OF THE VARIABLE PADDED WITH MISSING DATA. THE ORIGINAL DATA IS MAINTAINED AT ICPSR; THE CONSORTIUM WILL DO TABULATIONS AND ANALYSIS WITH THIS DATA FOR ANY USER WHO REQUESTS IT.

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 34
End: 34
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 32
Width: 1

Variable Text: SIZE OF PLACE CODE

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-4

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 35
End: 35
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 33
Width: 1

Variable Text: SELECTION STATUS

Range of Valid Data Values: 1-2

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 36
End: 36
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 34
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 37
End: 37
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 35
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 38
End: 38
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 36
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 39
End: 39
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 37
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 40
End: 40
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 38
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 41
End: 41
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 39
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 42
End: 42
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 40
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 43
End: 43
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 41
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 44
End: 44
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 42
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 45
End: 45
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 43
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 46
End: 46
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 44
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 47
End: 47
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 45
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 48
End: 48
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 46
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 49
End: 49
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 47
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 50
End: 50
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 48
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 51
End: 51
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 49
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 52
End: 52
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 50
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 53
End: 53
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 51
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 54
End: 54
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 52
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 55
End: 55
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 53
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 56
End: 56
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 54
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 57
End: 57
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 55
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 58
End: 58
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 56
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 59
End: 59
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 57
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 60
End: 60
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 58
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 61
End: 61
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 59
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 62
End: 62
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 60
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 63
End: 63
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 61
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 64
End: 64
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 62
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 65
End: 65
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 63
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 66
End: 66
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 64
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 67
End: 67
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 65
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 68
End: 68
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 66
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 69
End: 69
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 67
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 70
End: 70
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 68
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 71
End: 71
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 69
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 72
End: 72
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 70
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 73
End: 73
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 71
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 74
End: 74
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 72
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 75
End: 75
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 73
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 76
End: 76
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 74
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 77
End: 77
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 75
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 78
End: 78
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 76
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 79
End: 79
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 77
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 80
End: 80
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 1

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 78
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 19
End: 19
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 2

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 79
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 20
End: 20
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 2

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 80
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 21
End: 21
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 2

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 81
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 22
End: 22
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 2

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 82
Width: 1

CARD-IMAGE Location:

Start: 23
End: 23
Width: 1
Record Segment No. 2

OSIRIS Location:

Start: 83
Width: 1