WORLD VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993 AND 1995-1997: CUMULATIVE FILE FOR THE FIRST THREE WAVES (ICPSR 2790)

View:

Part 1: Document Description
Part 2: Study Description
Part 3: Data Files Description
Part 4: Variable Description
Entire Codebook

Ole Borre and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Scope of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Document Description

Citation

Title:

WORLD VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993 AND 1995-1997

Identification Number:

2790

Authoring Entity:

INGLEHART, RONALD. (University of Michigan)

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

et al.  (link)

Producer:

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Copyright:

Copyright ICPSR, 2000

Date of Production:

May 30, 2000

Software used in Production:

SoftQuad XMetaL

Funding Agency/Sponsor:

National Science Foundation

Grant Number:

SBR-9617813

Distributor:

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Date of Distribution:

May 30, 2000

Version:

ICPSR XML Version

Version Responsibility:

Sanda Ionescu

Bibliographic Citation:

Inglehart, Ronald, et al. WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, and 1995-1997 [Codebook file]. ICPSR XML version. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], 2000.

Holdings Information:

http://webapp.icpsr.umich.edu/cocoon/DDI/SAMPLES/02790.xml

Documentation Source

Title:

WORLD VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993 AND 1995-1997

Identification Number:

2790

Authoring Entity:

Inglehart, Ronald (University of Michigan)

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

et al.  (link)

Producer:

Institute for Social Research

Date of Production:

2000

Distributor:

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Date of Distribution:

2000

Series Name:

WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS SERIES

Series Information:

This series began as a set of surveys conducted in ten West European societies by the European Value Systems Study Group (EVSSG). The World Values Survey (WVS) grew out of those surveys and was initiated in 1981 to study the values and attitudes of mass publics across nations of different economic, educational, and cultural backgrounds. The title of the series was changed to "World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys" with the addition of the 1995-1997 data. The WVS project explores the hypothesis that mass belief systems are changing in ways that have important economic, political, and social consequences. The surveys are based on stratified, multistage random samples of adult citizens aged 18 and older. The samples are selected in two stages. First, a random selection of sampling locations is made to ensure all types of locations are represented. Next, a random selection of individuals is drawn. Each study contains information from interviews conducted with 300 to 4,000 respondents per country. The samples for the 1995-1997 surveys are representative of societies with per capita incomes as low as $300 per year to $30,000 per year plus. The major substantive areas covered in all studies may be generally grouped as follows: - The importance of work, family, friends, leisure time, politics, and religion. - Attitudes toward government and religion, including how often respondents participated in group activities within religious and government organizations. - Perceptions of economic, ethnic, religious, and political groups and feelings of trust and closeness toward these groups. - Assessment of the relative importance of major problems facing the world and willingness to participate in solutions. - Self-reported assessments of happiness and class identity. Demographic information includes family income, number of people residing in the home, size of locality, home ownership, region of residence, occupation of the head of household, and the respondent's age, sex, occupation, education, religion, religiosity, political party and union membership, and left-right political self-placement.

Bibliographic Citation:

Inglehart, Ronald, et al. WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, and 1995-1997 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research [producer], 2000. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2000.

Study Description

Citation

Title:

WORLD VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993 AND 1995-1997: CUMULATIVE FILE FOR THE FIRST THREE WAVES

Identification Number:

2790

Authoring Entity:

Inglehart, Ronald

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Marita Carballo de Cilley

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Gevork Pogosian

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Hans-Dieter Klingemann

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Alan Black

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ali Aliev

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Q. K. Ahmad

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Andrei Vardomatskii

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Carlos Eduardo Meirelles Matheus

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Robert M. Worcester

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Antony Todorov

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Marta Lagos

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Michael Guo

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Carlos Lemoine

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

John Sudarsky

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Vesna Pusic

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Josefina Zaiter

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Marcus Villaman

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Julio Valerion

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Mikk Titma

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Juhani Pehkonen

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Merab Pachulia

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Kareem Tejumola

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Pradeep Chhibber

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Subhasa Misra

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Seiko Yamazaki

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Yuji Fukuda

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Kenji Iijima

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ilze Koroleva

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Rasa Alishauskiene

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Miguel Basanez

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Alejandro Moreno

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ljubov Ishimova

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Vladimir Goati

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jovanka Matic

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Lilijana Bacevic

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Dragomir Pantic

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ola Listhaug

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Farooq Tanwir

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Catalina Romero

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Alfredo Torres

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Linda Luz Guerrero

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Mahar Mangahas

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Renata Siemienska

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Angel Rivera-Ortiz

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jorge Benitez-Nazario

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Elena Bashkirova

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Niko Tos

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Johann Mouton

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Anneke Greyling

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Robert Mattes

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Mari Harris

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Soo Young Auh

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Sang-jin Han

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Juan Diez Nicolas

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jose Ramon Torregrossa

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Juan del Pino Artacho

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jose Luis Elzo

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jose Luis Veira Veira

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Manuel Garcia Ferrando

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Thorleif Petterson

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Bi Puranen

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Simon Hug

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Pascal Sciarini

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Hei-Yuan Chiu

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Pi-chao Chen

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jin-yun Liu

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Yilmaz Esmer

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Olga Balakireva

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Cesar Aguiar

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jose Arocena

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Augustin Canzani

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Rafael Mendizabal

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

George Gallup

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Alec Gallup

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Max Larsen

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Gustavo Mendez

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jose Molina

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Friedrich Welsch

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Paul Zulehner

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Christian Friesl

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jan Kerkhofs

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Karel Dobbelaere

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jacques Rene Rabier

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

David Barker

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Stephen Harding

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Gordon Heald

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Noel Timms

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Andrei Raichev,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Kancho Stoichev

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Neil Nevitte

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Carlos Huneeus

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jiang Xingrong

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Xiang Zongde

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Vladimir Rak

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Marek Boguszak

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ivan Gabal

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Peter Gundelach

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ole Riis,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Andrus Saar

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Leila Lotti

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Helene Riffault

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Renate Koecher

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Elemer Hankiss,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Robert Manchin,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Stefan Olafsson,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Fridrik Jonsson,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Eric da Costa

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

V.P. Madhok,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Michael Fogarty,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Renzo Gubert

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Brigita Zepa,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Vladimir Yadov

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ruud de Moor

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Felix Heunks

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Loek Halman

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Luis de Franca

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Jorge Vala

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

J.C. Jesumo

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Vladimir Andreyenkov

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Catalin Zamfir,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Nicolae Lotreanu

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Mattei Dogan

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Christine Woessner

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Francisco Andres Orizo

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Javier Elzo

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Anna Melich

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ustun Erguder,

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Ersin Kalaycioglu

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

A.H. Ahmad

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Kosta Barjaba

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Russell Dalton

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Blanka Filipcova

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Christian Haerpfer

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

Juan Linz

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

R. C. Pandit

Other identifications and acknowledgements:

The 1981-84 surveys were coordinated by the European Values Survey group under the leadership of Jan Kerkhofs and Ruud de Moor, with an advisory committee consisting of Gordon Heald, Juan Linz, Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, Jacques Rabier and Helene Riffault. The 1990-1993 surveys were coordinated by the World Values Survey group and the European Values Survey group. The second wave of surveys was designed and coordinated by the following steering committee: Ruud de Moor, chair; Jan Kerkhofs, co-chair; Karel Dobbelaere, Loek Halman, Stephen Harding, Felix Heunks, Ronald Inglehart, Renate Koecher, Jacques Rabier and Noel Timms. Inglehart organized the surveys in non-European countries and in several East European countries. The following steering committee was elected to guide the design and execution of the third wave: Ronald Inglehart, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, U.S.A. (chair); Elena Bashkirova, Russian Public Opinion and Market Research Institute, Moscow, Russia; Miguel Basanez, Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico; Hei-yuan Chiu, Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan; Juan Diez-Nicolas, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain; Yilmaz Esmer, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey; Loek Halman, University of Tilburg, The Netherlands; Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Free University of Berlin and Berlin Science Center; Elone Nwabuzor, University of Benin, Benin, Nigeria; Thorleif Petterson, Uppsala University, Sweden; Renata Siemienska, University of Warsaw, Poland; Seiko Yamazaki, Dentsu Institute for Human Studies, Tokyo, Japan; Alan Webster, Massey University, North Palmerston, New Zealand; Klingemann coordinated fieldwork in Germany and Central and Eastern Europe. The EVS group did not participate in this wave. The 1995-1998 surveys were coordinated by Inglehart, who also assembled and documented this three-wave dataset.

Producer:

Institute for Social Research

Date of Production:

2000

Funding Agency/Sponsor:

National Science Foundation

Grant Number:

SBR 9422899

Distributor:

Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Date of Distribution:

2000

Series Name:

WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS SERIES

Series Information:

This series began as a set of surveys conducted in ten West European societies by the European Value Systems Study Group (EVSSG). The World Values Survey (WVS) grew out of those surveys and was initiated in 1981 to study the values and attitudes of mass publics across nations of different economic, educational, and cultural backgrounds. The title of the series was changed to "World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys" with the addition of the 1995-1997 data. The WVS project explores the hypothesis that mass belief systems are changing in ways that have important economic, political, and social consequences. The surveys are based on stratified, multistage random samples of adult citizens aged 18 and older. The samples are selected in two stages. First, a random selection of sampling locations is made to ensure all types of locations are represented. Next, a random selection of individuals is drawn. Each study contains information from interviews conducted with 300 to 4,000 respondents per country. The samples for the 1995-1997 surveys are representative of societies with per capita incomes as low as $300 per year to $30,000 per year plus. The major substantive areas covered in all studies may be generally grouped as follows: - The importance of work, family, friends, leisure time, politics, and religion. - Attitudes toward government and religion, including how often respondents participated in group activities within religious and government organizations. - Perceptions of economic, ethnic, religious, and political groups and feelings of trust and closeness toward these groups. - Assessment of the relative importance of major problems facing the world and willingness to participate in solutions. - Self-reported assessments of happiness and class identity. Demographic information includes family income, number of people residing in the home, size of locality, home ownership, region of residence, occupation of the head of household, and the respondent's age, sex, occupation, education, religion, religiosity, political party and union membership, and left-right political self-placement.

Bibliographic Citation:

Inglehart, Ronald, et al. WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, and 1995-1997 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research [producer], 2000. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2000.

Study Scope

Topic Classification:

SOCIAL INDICATORS, B. Nations Other Than the United States

Abstract:

The series is designed to enable a crossnational comparison of values and norms on a wide variety of topics and to monitor changes in values and attitudes across the globe. This data collection consists of responses from WORLD VALUES SURVEY, 1981-1983 (ICPSR 9309) and WORLD VALUES SURVEY, 1981-1984 AND 1990-1993 (ICPSR 6160), along with data gathered during 1995-1997. Over 60 surveys representing more than 50 countries participated in the 1995-1997 study. The 1995 questionnaire retained those items that gave the most significant results from the 1981 and 1990 surveys. New topics pertaining to technology, social relationships, and parent-child relationships were added. Broad topics covered were work, personal finances, the economy, politics, allocation of resources, contemporary social issues, technology and its impact on society, and traditional values. Respondents were asked whether the following acts were ever justifiable: suicide, cheating on taxes, lying, euthanasia, divorce, and abortion. Respondents were also asked about the groups and associations they belonged to, which ones they worked for voluntarily, the groups they would not want as neighbors, their general state of health, and whether they felt they had free choice and control over their lives. A wide range of items was included on the meaning and purpose of life, such as respondents' views on the value of scientific advances, the demarcation of good and evil, and religious behavior and beliefs. Respondents were also queried about their attitudes toward religion, morality, politics, sexual freedom, marriage, single parenting, child-rearing, and the importance of work, family, politics, and religion in their lives. Questions relating to work included what financial and social benefits were most important to them in a job, the pride they took in their work, if they were happy with their current position, and their views on owner/state/employee management of business. Questions pertaining to the stability of the world economy, solutions for poverty, and whether respondents were happy with their financial situation were also asked. Respondents' opinions of various forms of political action, the most important aims for their countries, confidence in various civil and governmental institutions, and whether they would fight in a war for their country were also solicited. Demographic information includes family income, number of people residing in the home, size of locality, home ownership, region of residence, occupation of the head of household, and the respondent's age, sex, occupation, education, religion, religiosity, political party and union membership, and left-right political self-placement.

The World Values Surveys grew out of a study launched by the European Values Survey group (EVS) under the leadership of Jan Kerkhofs and Ruud de Moor, with an advisory committee consisting of Gordon Heald, Juan Linz, Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, Jacques Rabier and Helene Riffault. In 1981, the EVS carried out surveys in ten West European societies; it evoked such widespread interest that it was replicated in 12 additional countries. Findings from these surveys suggested that pervasive and partially predictable cultural changes were taking place. To monitor these changes, a new wave of surveys was launched, this time designed to be carried out globally. The second wave of surveys was designed and coordinated by the following steering committee: Ruud de Moor, chair; Jan Kerkhofs, co-chair; Karel Dobbelaere, Loek Halman, Stephen Harding, Felix Heunks, Ronald Inglehart, Renate Koecher, Jacques Rabier and Noel Timms. Inglehart organized the surveys in non-European countries and in several East European countries. WVS Participants from nearly 40 societies on all six inhabited continents met in Spain in September 1993 to evaluate results of the first two waves of surveys. Coherent patterns of change in a wide range of key values were observed from 1981 to 1990. To monitor these changes and probe more deeply into their causes and consequences, the group agreed to carry out additional waves of research in 1995 and 2000; and began designing the 1995 wave. This wave gave special attention to obtaining better coverage of non-Western societies and to analyzing the development of a democratic political culture in the emerging Third Wave democracies. A fourth wave of surveys is being carried out jointly by the EVS and WVS groups, in 1999-2000. The usefulness of these surveys has grown as they have expanded to provide more complete coverage of the world's societies, and as the time series that they cover has grown longer. The 1981-83 survey covered 22 independent countries plus surveys in Northern Ireland and Tambov oblast of the Russian republic; the 1990-93 survey covered 42 independent countries plus surveys in Northern Ireland, and Greater Moscow; the 1995-97 survey covered 53 independent countries, plus surveys in Puerto Rico, Tambov oblast, Montenegro, the Andalusian, Basque, Galician and Valencian regions of Spain and a pilot survey in Ghana. In all, 64 independent countries have been surveyed in at least one wave of this investigation (counting East Germany as an independent country, which it was when first surveyed). These countries include almost 80 percent of the world's population. The World Values surveys provide a broader range of variation than has ever before been available for analyzing the impact of the values and beliefs of mass publics on political and social life. This unique data base makes it possible to examine cross-level linkages, such as that between public values and economic growth; or between environmental pollution and mass attitudes toward environmental protection; or that between political culture and democratic institutions. This project is a confederation of equal partners. It has been carried out with little central funding and hence, with minimal central control. In most countries, funding for fieldwork and analysis was obtained from local sources. In return for providing the data from a representative national sample of their own country, each participating group obtains immediate access to the data from all of the other surveys. They also become part of a global network of social scientists that interacts electronically and in international conferences, exchanging ideas and interpretations of the observed cross-national differences and changes over time. A major goal of this project has been to expand participation beyond the ranks of the advanced industrial societies to which most previous survey research has been limited, involving participants from developing countries and non-Western societies, and to transcend the boundaries that until recently divided the world into Eastern and Western blocs. There were two main reasons for doing so. The first was an intellectual purpose: the steering committee of the WVS was convinced that only by including the full range of economic, cultural and political variation, would it be possible to effectively analyze the sources of variation in human belief systems-and their impact on society. The second reason for adopting this strategy was in order to aid the diffusion of empirical social science techniques into societies in which they previously have been little used. We believe that survey research is likely to play an increasingly important role as societies develop, providing both social scientists and decision-makers with valuable information about mass beliefs and preferences. These two goals complement each other. Starting with the 1990 survey, participants from all six inhabited continents have been involved in the design, fieldwork, analysis and interpretation of the World Values Surveys. This many-sided interaction, involving people with a wide variety of perspectives, has enhanced the effectiveness of the World Values Survey. It has produced hundreds of publications in many languages. Even more important, it has enabled the World Values Survey to become a genuinely worldwide investigation, carried out by a global network of social scientists. The 1995-1997 study is the third wave of the WVS and includes more than 60 surveys, representing a majority of the world's population and ranging from societies with per capita incomes as low as $300 per year, to societies with per capita incomes as high as $30,000 per year; and from long-established democracies with market economies, to various types of authoritarian states. The 1990 World Values surveys were carried out in 43 societies, and the 1981 surveys were carried out in 22 societies, providing time series data for many societies, enabling us to analyze the changes in values and attitudes that took place during the years between the three sets of surveys. The 1995 questionnaire retains those items that gave the most significant results from the 1981 and 1990 surveys, replicating about 60 per cent of the 1990 questionnaire. The additional space made available was used to probe more deeply into key topics, particularly democratization and cultural change. The WVS project explores the hypothesis that mass belief systems are changing in ways that have important economic, political and social consequences. It does not assume either economic or cultural determinism: findings to date suggest that the relationships between values, economics and politics are reciprocal, with the exact nature of the linkages in given cases being an empirical question, rather than something that can be determined a priori. In most cases, the fieldwork for these surveys is supported by funding from within the given country. Each national team furnishes a copy of their data to the central coordinator at Ann Arbor, and in return receives the data from all participating countries. This arrangement has a powerful multiplier effect, enabling each national group to interpret their findings in a much broader, developmental and cross-cultural perspective.

Time Period:

1981 [1st wave]-1984 [1st wave]1990 [2nd wave]-1993 [2nd wave]1995 [3rd wave]-1997 [3rd wave]

Date of Collection:

1981 [Specific fieldwork period for each country and survey wave is shown in the "dataCollector" element]-1997 [Specific fieldwork period for each country and survey wave is shown in the "dataCollector" element]

Country:

FRANCE, BRITAIN, WEST-GERMANY, ITALY, NETHERLANDS, DENMARK, BELGIUM, SPAIN, IRELAND, NORTHERN-IRELAND, USA, CANADA, JAPAN, MEXICO, SOUTH-AFRICA, HUNGARY, AUSTRALIA, NORWAY, SWEDEN, TAMBOV-RUSSIA, ICELAND, ARGENTINA, FINLAND, SOUTH-KOREA, POLAND, SWITZERLAND, PUERTO-RICO, BRAZIL, NIGERIA, CHILE, BELARUS, INDIA, CZECH (REPUBLIC), EAST-GERMANY, SLOVENIA, BULGARIA, ROMANIA, PAKISTAN, CHINA, TAIWAN, PORTUGAL, AUSTRIA, TURKEY, MOSCOW-1990, LITHUANIA, LATVIA, ESTONIA, UKRAINE, RUSSIA, PERU, VENEZUELA, URUGUAY, GHANA, PHILIPPINES, MOLDOVA, GEORGIA, ARMENIA, AZERBAIJAN, DOMINICAN-REPUBLIC, BANGLADESH, COLOMBIA, BASQUE (COUNTRY), ANDALUSIA, GALICIA, VALENCIA, SERBIA, MONTENEGRO, MACEDONIA, CROATIA, SLOVAKIA, BOSNIA

Geographic Coverage:

nation  (link)

Geographic Unit(s):

nation  (link)

Unit of Analysis:

individuals

Universe:

Adults 18 and over in the mass publics of 60 societies representing more than 50 different countries around the world.

Kind of Data:

survey data

Notes:

The 1981-1983 wave included surveys in Northern Ireland and the Tambov oblast of the Russian republic; the 1990-1993 wave included surveys in Northern Ireland and Greater Moscow; the 1995-1997 wave included surveys in Puerto Rico, Tambov oblast, Montenegro, and the Andalusian, Basque, Galician and Valencian regions of Spain.

Methodology and Processing

Time Method:

time series

Data Collector:

1981-1984: Argentina 1984 Gallup-Argentina

1981-1984: Australia 1981 Roy Morgan (Gallup)

1981-1984: Belgium 1981 Dimarso

1981-1984: Canada 1981 Gallup-Canada

1981-1984: Denmark 1981 Observa SA

1981-1984: Japan 1981 Nippon Research Center

1981-1984: Finland 1981 Suomen Gallup (Gallup-Finland)

1981-1984: France 1981 Faits et Opinions

1981-1984: West Germany 1981 Institut fuer Demoskopie

1981-1984: Great Britain 1981 Social Surveys (Gallup)

1981-1984: Hungary 1982 Hungarian Academy of Sciences

1981-1984: Iceland 1981 University of Iceland

1981-1984: Ireland 1981 Irish Marketing Surveys

1981-1984: Italy 1981 DOXA

1981-1984: Mexico 1981 IMOP (Gallup-Mexico)

1981-1984: Netherlands 1981 NIPO

1981-1984: Northern Ireland 1981 Irish Marketing Surveys

1981-1984: Norway 1982 Central Bureau of Statistics

1981-1984: South Africa 1982 Markinor

1981-1984: South Korea 1982 Gallup

1981-1984: Spain 1981 DATA SA

1981-1984: Sweden 1982 Gallup-Sweden

1981-1984: Tambov oblast 1982 USSR Academy of Sciences

1981-1984: United States 1982 The Gallup Organization

1990-1993: ARGENTINA--Instituto Gallup de la Argentina (Buenos Aires) February-April, 1991

1990-1993: AUSTRIA--Fessel + GFK Institut (Vienna) ; June-July, 1990

1990-1993: BELARUS--Institute of Sociology, Belarus Academy of Sciences (Minsk); October-November, 1990.

1990-1993: BELGIUM -- Dimarso-Gallup, Belgium (Brussels); June, 1990

1990-1993: BRAZIL--Instituto Gallup de Opiniao Publica (Sao Paolo) ; October, 1991-January, 1992

1990-1993: BRITAIN -- Gallup (London) ; June-September, 1990.

1990-1993: BULGARIA--National Public Opinion Center (Sofia); August, 1990

1990-1993: CANADA -- Gallup-Canada (Toronto) ; May-June, 1990

1990-1993: CHILE --Centro de Estudios de la Realidad Contemporanea (Santiago) ; May, 1990.

1990-1993: CHINA--China Statistical Information Center (Beijing), ; July-December, 1990

1990-1993: CZECHOSLOVAKIA -- Association for Independent Social Analysis (Prague); September, 1990

1990-1993: DENMARK --Socialforskningsinstituttet (Danish National Institute of Social Research),(Copenhagen); April-May, 1990

1990-1993: ESTONIA--Mass Communication Research and Information Center (Tallinn); June-August, 1990

1990-1993:FINLAND --Suomen Gallup [Gallup-Finland] (Helskinki) N=588; April, 1990.

1990-1993: FRANCE -- Faits et Opinions (Paris); June-July, 1990

1990-1993: (EAST) GERMANY -- Institut fuer Demoskopie (Allensbach) ; Fall, 1990.

1990-1993: (WEST) GERMANY -- Institut fuer Demoskopie (Allensbach) ; June-July, 1990

1990-1993: HUNGARY--Gallup, Hungary (Budapest); May-June, 1990

1990-1993: ICELAND --University of Iceland, Social Science Research Institute,; April, 1990.

1990-1993: INDIA--Indian Institute of Public Opinion (New Delhi) ; July-December, 1990.

1990-1993: IRELAND -- Economic and Social Research Institute (Dublin) ; July-October, 1990

1990-1993: NORTHERN-IRELAND ; July-September, 1990.

1990-1993: ITALY -- Centro internazionale di recerche sociali sulle aree montane (Trento) ; October-November, 1990.

1990-1993: JAPAN -- Nippon Research Center Ltd. [Gallup-Japan] (Tokyo) ; September, 1990

1990-1993: SOUTH KOREA -- Ewha University (Seoul) ; June-July, 1990.

1990-1993: LATVIA--Public Opinion Research Group, Latvian Sociological Association (Riga) ; June-August, 1990

1990-1993: LITHUANIA-- Vilnius State University Sociological Laboratory (Vilnius); June-August, 1990.

1990-1993: MEXICO -- Market and Opinion Research International [MORI de Mexico] (Mexico City); May, 1990.

1990-1993: MOSCOW--Institute of Sociology, Soviet Academy of Sciences (Moscow); October-November, 1990

1990-1993: NETHERLANDS -- Institut voor Sociaal-Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Tilburg); June-August, 1990.

1990-1993: NIGERIA -- Research and Marketing Services, Ltd. [Gallup-Nigeria] (Lagos) ; May-June, 1990

1990-1993: NORWAY --survey division of Norwegian Central Bureau of Statistics (Oslo); April-June, 1990

1990-1993: POLAND -- Osrodek Badania Opinii Publicznej [survey unit of Polish Radio-Television] (Warsaw) ; November-December, 1989.

1990-1993: PORTUGAL -- EuroExpansao, S.A. (Lisbon); May-July, 1990.

1990-1993: RUSSIA--Institute for Social and Political Research, Soviet Academy of Sciences (Moscow) ; January, 1991

1990-1993: ROMANIA--Institute for Research on Quality of Life, Romanian Academy of Sciences (Bucharest); Spring, 1993

1990-1993: SLOVENIA--Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Ljubljana ; February, 1992

1990-1993: SOUTH AFRICA--Markinor (Johannesburg); October-November, 1990.

1990-1993: SPAIN--DATA, Madrid ; April-May, 1990

1990-1993: SPAIN -- Analisis Sociologicas, Economicos Y Politicos (ASEP) Madrid. ; May, 1990

1990-1993: SWEDEN --Svenska Institutet for Opinionsundersokingar (SIFO)[Gallup-Sweden] (Stockholm); April-May, 1990

1990-1993: SWITZERLAND--ISOPUBLIC, Institut Suisse d'Opinion Publique (Zurich); November 1988-February, 1989

1990-1993: TURKEY-- Bogazici University, Department of Political Science (Istanbul); November, 1990 - January, 1991.

1990-1993: U.S.A.-- The Gallup Organization (Princeton); May-June, 1990.

1995-1997: ARGENTINA--Instituto Gallup de la Argentina (Buenos Aires); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: ARMENIA--Sociological Research Center, Armenian Academy of Sciences (Yerevan). February, 1997.

1995-1997: AUSTRALIA--Roy Morgan Research Center (Melbourne); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: AZERBAIJAN-SIAR (Baku); Nov, 1996. .

1995-1997: BANGLADESH--Bangladesh Unnayan Parishad (BUP) (Dhaka); August, 1996.

1995-1997: BELARUS--NOVAK Institute (Minsk); December, 1996.

1995-1997: BOSNIA-HERCEGOVINA- Ivan Hartjiisky Institute for Social Values and Structures (Sofia, Bulgaria), April, 1998.

1995-1997: BRAZIL--Instituto Gallup de Opiniao Publico (Sao Paulo); Fall, 1997.

1995-1997: BRITAIN--MORI (London); March, 1998.

1995-1997: BULGARIA-Ivan Hartijiisky Institute for Social Values and Structures [BBSS Gallup International] (Sofia); December, 1997.

1995-1997: CHILE--CERC (Santiago); Spring, 1996.

1995-1997: CHINA--Gallup-China (Beijing); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: COLOMBIA--Centro Nacional de Consultoria (Bogota), 1997 and april 1998.

CROATIA--Institute for the Culture of Democracy, Erasmus Guild (Zagreb); December, 1995.

1995-1997: DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. Centro POVEDA (Santo Domingo); April, 1996.

1995-1997: EAST GERMANY--FORSA (Berlin); March, 1997.

1995-1997: ESTONIA--Center for Social Studies in Eastern Europe (Tallinn). Oct-Nov, 1996.

1995-1997: FINLAND--Suomen Gallup (Espoo); Spring, 1996.

1995-1997: GEORGIA--Georgian Institute of Public Opinion, (Tbilisi); December, 1996.

1995-1997: GHANA-- Research and Marketing Services, Ltd. (Lagos); October, 1995.

1995-1997: INDIA--OASES (New Delhi); 1995-1996.

1995-1997: JAPAN--Nippon Research Center (Tokyo); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997:LATVIA--Foundation for the Advancement of Sociological Studies; Oct-Nov, 1996.

1995-1997: LITHUANIA--Baltic Surveys (Vilnius); Oct-Nov, 1996.

1995-1997: MACEDONIA-Ivan Hartjiisky Institute for Social Values and Structures (Sofia, Bulgaria); December, 1997.

1995-1997: MEXICO--MORI de Mexico and Reforma (Mexico City); Fall, 1995 and Spring, 1996.

1995-1997: MOLDOVA-Institute of Sociology, Moldovan Academy of Sciences (Chisinau), December, 1996.

1995-1997: MONTENEGRO--Institute of Social Sciences, University of Belgrade (Belgrade). October, 1996.

1995-1997: NIGERIA--Research and Marketing Services, Ltd. (Lagos); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: NORWAY--Norwegian Central Bureau of Statistics; Fall, 1996.

1995-1997: PAKISTAN-Department of Rural Sociology, University of Agriculture (Faisalabad); March-September, 1997.

1995-1997: PERU-- Gerente de Apoyo, S.A. (Lima); May, 1996.

1995-1997: PHILIPPINES -- Social Weather Stations (Quezon City); March-April 1996.

1995-1997: POLAND--Centrum Badania Opinii Spolecznej (Warsaw); January-February, 1997.

1995-1997: PUERTO RICO--College of Social Science, University of Puerto Rico (Rio Piedras); Fall 1995.

1995-1997: RUSSIA-Russian Public Opinion and Market Research [ROMIR] (Moscow); November-December, 1995.

1995-1997: SERBIA--Institute of Social Sciences, University of Belgrade (Belgrade). October, 1996.

1995-1997: SLOVENIA--Survey Research Center, University of Ljubjana (Ljubjana); September-November, 1995. .

1995-1997: SOUTH AFRICA--Markinor (Stellenbosch); Spring, 1996.

1995-1997: SOUTH KOREA--Ewah Women's University (Seoul) and Seoul National University; Spring 1996.

1995-1997: SPAIN--ASEP (Madrid); October, 1995.

1995-1997: ANDALUCIA- Instituto Andaluz de Estadistica (Malaga). March, 1996.

1995-1997: BASQUE COUNTRY- Facultad de Ciencias Politicas y Sociologia, Universidad de Deusto (Bilbao). May-June 1995.

1995-1997: GALICIA-Facultad de Sociologia, Universidad de la Coruna (La Coruna). November, 1995.

1995-1997: VALENCIA-Departamento de Sociologia, Universidad de Valencia (Valencia). October, 1995.

1995-1997: SWEDEN--TEMO (Solna); Spring, 1996.

1995-1997: SWITZERLAND--Geselleschaft fuer Socialforschung (XX); Fall, 1996.

1995-1997: TAMBOV-- ROMIR (Moscow); Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: TAIWAN--Survey Research Center, Academia Sinica (Taipei); summer, 1994 and summer1995.

1995-1997: TURKEY-Survey Research Center, Bogazici University (Istanbul); December, 1996-January, 1997.

1995-1997: UKRAINE--Social Monitoring Center, National Institute for Strategic Studies (Kiev); September, 1996.

1995-1997: URUGUAY--Equipos Consultores Associados (Montevideo). October, 1996.

1995-1997: U.S.A.-- The Gallup Organization (Princeton) Fall, 1995.

1995-1997: VENEZUELA--DOXA (Caracas); March-April, 1996.

1995-1997: WEST GERMANY-FORSA (Berlin); March-April, 1997.

Frequency of Data Collection:

Three waves of surveys were completed in 1981-1984, 1990-1993 and 1995-1997; a fourth wave is being carried out in 1999-2000.

Sampling Procedure:

Both national random and quota sampling were used. The populations of India, China, and Nigeria, as well as rural areas and the illiterate population, were undersampled.;

All surveys were carried out with a sampling universe consisting of all adult citizens, ages 18 and older. In most cases, stratified multi-stage random sampling was used, with the samples being selected in two stages. First, a random selection of sampling locations was made ensuring that all types of location were represented in proportion to their population. Next, a random selection of individuals was drawn up. In some countries, individuals were selected from electoral rolls or from a central registry of citizens. In Norway, and Sweden, stratified random samples were interviewed. The U.S. and Canada used stratified random samples, with three call backs. The Japanese used a stratified multi-stage random sample, drawing names from records maintained by local government agencies. Most other countries used multi-stage random sampling to select the household, with given individuals in the household being selected using a Kish grid to select the person to be interviewd from a listing of all those in the household. In some countries, the final selection was made by quota sampling with quotas assigned on the basis of sex, age, occupation and region, using census data as a guide to the distribution of each group in the population. The Chinese survey used stratified multi-stage random sampling, first stratifying the provinces according to three levels of economic development, with several provinces being randomly selected within each of these strata. In the usual sampling design, within each country, a multi-stage, random selection of sampling points is carried out, with a number of points being drawn from all administrative regional units after stratification by region and degree of urbanization. In each sampling point a starting address is drawn at random. Further addresses are selected by random route procedures. All interviews are carried out face-to-face at home, in the respective national languages. National samples were used in all but the following cases: sub-national surveys were carried out in Northern Ireland and the greater Moscow region (which was surveyed in 1990 in addition to the entire Russian republic). In 1981 when it was not possible to survey the entire Russian republic, a survey was carried out in Tambov oblast of the Russian republic. Tambov oblast was surveyed again in 1995, to permit time-series comparisons; we interviewed a representative Russian national sample of 2,040 in addition to the subsample of 500 persons in the Tambov region. In 1995, regional surveys were carried out in the Andalusian, Basque, Galician and Valencian regions of Spain, in addition to the Spanish national survey. Puerto Rico was also surveyed in 1995. In Chile, the sample covers the central portion of the country, which contains 63% of the total population; the income level of this region is about 40% higher than the national average. In Argentina, sampling was limited to the urbanized central portion of the country, where about 70 per cent of the population is concentrated, and which also has above-average incomes. Within this region, 200 sampling points were selected, with approximately five individuals being interviewed in each sampling point through multi-stage probability sampling moving through zones, sections and dwellings to individuals. In India, in both 1990 and 1995, the sample was stratified to allocate 90% of the interviews to urban areas and 10% to rural areas; and to have 90% of the respondents with literate respondents (who are slightly less than 50% of the population). The interviews were distributed among 16 states in proportion to their population. This sample was stratified to be representative of age, sex and region, but overrepresents urban and literate respondents: only ten percent of these interviews was carried out in rural areas, as was the case with the 1990 survey. Weighting is necessary to approximate national population parameters. In Nigeria, in 1990 the fieldwork was limited to urban areas plus a sample of rural areas within 100 kilometers of an urban center. In Nigeria, national samples of the adult population were interviewed, in all 30 states in proportion to their population. The interviews were carried out in the respective languages of the given region, and were stratified to be 40 percent urban and 60 per cent rural. In the 1995 Nigerian survey, in the South, rural areas were randomly selected from a list of rural settlements within a 10 kilometer radius of the selected urban towns; in the North they were selected from within a 50 kilometer radius of the selected towns In China the sample is 90 per cent urban and largely excludes the illiterate population. In both 1981 and 1990, the samples from both the United States and South Africa were stratified by race, overrepresenting minority races. The weight variable corrects for this. The Swiss surveys are stratified by language group, producing a sample that overrepresents the French-speaking and Italian-speaking groups; to obtain a nationally representative sample, the weight variable should be used. In Russia, the individual respondent were selected from centralized lists of the place of residence of everyone living in the jurisdiction of a particular state-run address bureau. Because of communal living arrangments, this has some advantages over a within-household random selection. The weight variable also corrects for obvious deviations from national population parameters in age and education in other countries. In the 1981 surveys, for example, it compensates for the fact that the 18-24 year old age group was oversampled by a factor of roughly two. In most cases, the more highly educated are oversampled, and are accordingly weighted less heavily than the less educated. ADDITIONAL NOTES FROM 1990 SURVEYS: In Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Italy and the Republic of Ireland, individuals were selected from electoral rolls; in Slovenia they were selected from a central registry of citizens. In Norway, Sweden and Denmark, stratified random samples were interviewed, with response rates averaging 71%. The U.S. and Canada used stratified random samples, with three call backs. The Japanese used a stratified multi-stage random sample, drawing names from records maintained by local government agencies; completed interviews were obtained with 62 per cent of the individuals drawn. The 1990 Chinese survey used stratified multi-stage random sampling, first stratifying the provinces according to three levels of economic development, with several provinces being randomly selected within each of these strata. Within each province, approximately 20 sampling points were selected randomly, with five individuals being interviewed at each point. The population was stratified according to rural-urban residence, sex, age, occupation and education, and within these sampling points, each stratum was sampled by quota, with a 10 per cent subsample of illiterate persons. The 1990 Indian survey was stratified to cover 14 states representing different geographic and socioeconomic regions of the country, with 2,500 interviews distributed among these states in proportion to their population. Within these 14 states, about 10 per cent of the Parliamentary Constituencies were selected and 50 interviews allocated to each one. The interviews were then stratified according to town size, allocating 90 per cent to urban areas, but stratifying according to population within the urban sample. A quota sample was then designed which is representative in terms of age and sex, but not education, since the sample design called for 90% of the interviews to be carried out with the literate part of the public. Within this segment, interviews were stratified according to education. Interviews were carried out in the eight most widely-spoken langugages of India, but the rural 10 per cent of the sample was confined to the five Hindi-speaking states in the sample. The 1990 Nigerian sample was stratified in a similar fashion, with 90 per cent of the interviews being carried out with the urban and literate segments of the population. It was then stratified by age, sex and education, within 17 provinces representing the major ethnic groups in the country. Most surveys in these countries undersample rural and illiterate respondents, who tend to give large numbers of "don't know" responses.

Major Deviations from the Sample Design:

One consequence of the strategy of striving for inclusiveness has been that the quality of fieldwork varies cross-nationally. Like most aspects of human endeavor, performance tends to improve with experience. Moreover, the logistical difficulties involved in interviewing a representative national sample of the population of such countries as China, Peru or Nigeria are far greater than they are in richer and more urbanized countries such as Sweden, the United States or Japan.For these reasons, the quality of our samples tends to be higher in advanced industrial societies that have been conducting representative national samples for several decades, than in countries in which survey research is new. In a number of the societies included in this project, survey research has only recently become possible, and in some cases the World Values Survey was the first representative national survey ever carried out in that country. Our strategy has been to recruit the some of best social scientists in the given country, and to carry out the survey using the best available sampling techniques, rather than to wait until optimal conditions are present-which would mean limiting the project mainly to economically developed societies. With substantially greater funding, it would be possible to have the best of both worlds, carrying out fully random probability samples throughout the world. We believe that this would be a worthwhile allocation of resources, and hope that it will be possible in the future. For the present, we have striven for global inclusiveness using available resources. We have analyzed these data extensively, and where possible, have compared the results with those from other surveys. The results leave little doubt in our minds that, even with the societies where survey techniques are new, the findings are generally reliable.The surveys from most low income countries undersample the illiterate portion of the public and oversample the urban areas and the more educated strata. The present dataset is weighted to correct for these and other features of sampling; but it would be unrealistic to view the samples from the low income countries as fully comparable to those from advanced industrial societies. Because of these factors, it is advisable to use the weight variable (V236) in most analyses. Our analyses indicate that the more educated and more urbanized oversampled groups within low-income countries tend to have orientations relatively similar to those found in the publics of industrial societies. This means that our data tend to underestimate the size of cross-national differences involving these countries; nevertheless, we consistently find sizeable differences between the prevailing values of rich and poor societies.

Mode of Data Collection:

face-to-face interviews

Type of Research Instrument:

structured

Weighting:

The present data set is weighted to correct for undersampling of the illiterate portion of the public and oversampling of the urban areas and more educated strata, as well as for other obvious deviations from national population parameters.  (link)

Cleaning Operations:

Missing data codes were standardized by data producer/principal investigator.

Cleaning Operations:

Checks for undocumented codes performed by ICPSR.

Cleaning Operations:

Data reformatted by ICPSR

Cleaning Operations:

In the data for 1981-1984 and 1990-1993, the wild codes were changed to undocumented codes.

Notes:

The Principal Investigators were unable to collect documentation for all of the code values which appear in the nation-specific variables. Some of these values are labeled as "documentation not available" or "undocumented code" in the codebook. Users should note that some code values are not included in the codebook and others have no cases in the data file.

Response Rate:

Most of the participating institutes did not report response rates. Using a probability sample, the Slovenian group reports an impressive 87% response rate. The highest rate was reported by the Czech group, which drew a 1990 quota sample of 1,450 interviews stratified by sex, age, education, region and size of community, within 303 randomly selected sampling points; they obtained 1,396 completed interviews, for a remarkably high response rate of 96%. The 1990 Romanian survey used a pure quota sample, stratified by age, sex, occupation, and size of the community within each of nine regions of the country. They report that, despite the lengthy interview, the number of those who refused to be interviewed was very small.

Data Access

Location:

Ann Arbor, Mi.: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research

Extent of Collection:

1 data file + machine-readable documentation (PDF) + SAS data definition statements + SPSS data definition statements;

Number of Files:

4 files

Citation Requirement:

Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Inglehart, Ronald, et al. WORLD VALUES SURVEYS AND EUROPEAN VALUES SURVEYS, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, AND 1995-1997 [Computer file]. ICPSR Version. Ann Arbor, Mi.: Institute for Social Research [producer], 2000. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2000.

Deposit Requirement:

To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Please indicate in a cover letter which data were used.

Disclaimer:

The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

Other Study Description Materials

Related Publications

Paul Abramson and Ronald Inglehart, Value Change in Global Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.

Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs (eds.) Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Citation

Title:

Max Kaase and Kenneth Newton, Beliefs in Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1995.

Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1996.

Ronald Inglehart, Neil Nevitte and Miguel Basanez. Cultural Change in North America? Closer Economic, Political and Cultural Ties between the United States, Canada and Mexico. Hawthorne, N.Y: Aldine de Gruyter, 1996.

Neil Nevitte, The Decline of Deference: Canadian Value Change in Cross-National Perspective. Petersborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 1996.

Ronald Inglehart, Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.

Joseph S. Nye, Philip D. Zelikow and David C. King (eds.) Why People Don't Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.

Ronald Inglehart, Miguel Basanez and Alejandro Moreno, Human Values and Beliefs: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998.

Pippa Norris, (ed.) Critical Citizens: Support for Democratic Government, New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Mark Warren (ed.), Democracy and Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Ed Diener and Mark Suh (eds.) Subjective Well-Being in Global Perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.

Abbruzzese, S. 1992. L'Italia dei valori. Micromega 4: 123-32.

Abela, Anthony M. 1992. Transmitting Values in European Malta. A Study in the Contemporary Values of Modern Society. Valletta and Rome: Jesuit Publications/Editrice Pontificia Universita Gregoriana.

Abela, Anthony M. 1992. European values study in Malta. Melita Theologica, University of Malta, XLIII: 33-38.

Abela, Anthony M. 1993. Post-secularisation: The social significance of religious values in four Catholic European countries. Melita Theolgica XLIV: 39-58.

Abela, Anthony M. 1993. Valori per il futuro di Malta. La Civilta Cattolica Quaderno 3429, Roma: 260-69.

Abela, Anthony M. 1994. Values for Malta's future. Social change, values and social policy. In R.G. Sultana and G. Baldacchino (eds.), Maltese Society. A Sociological Inquiry. Malta: Mireva Publications.

Abela, Anthony M. 1995. Youth and Religion in Malta. Social Compass 42: 59-67.

Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart. 1994. Education, security, and postmaterialism. American Journal of Political Science 38, 3.

Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart. 1994. Generational change: Cohort effects and period effects. In Henk Becker and Piet Hermkens (eds.) Solidarity of Generations: Demographics, Economic and Social Change and its Consequences. Amsterdam: Thesis, 1994, pp. 71-109

. Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart. 1995. Value Change in Global Perspective. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Aish-Van Vaerenbergh, Ann-Marie, and Jacques-Rene Rabier. 1994. Algunas reflexiones metodologicas sobre la investigacion estadistica intercultural sobre los valores. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Akker, Piet van den, and Sheena Ashford. 1995. Individualism in contemporary Europe. The case of Eastern Europe. in Ruud de Moor (ed.), Values in Western Society. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Akker, Piet van den, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Primary relations in Western societies. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Alishauskene, Rasa. 1994. El humor politica en la poblacion lituana. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Ashford, A., and Loek Halman. 1994. Changing attitudes in the European community. In C. Rootes and H. Davies (eds.), Social Change and Political Transformation, pp. 72-85. London: UCL Press.

Ashford, Sheena, and Noel Timms. 1992. What Europe Thinks: A Study of Western European Values. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co.

Auh, Soo Young. 1991. The impact of value change on democratization in South Korea. Korean Political Science Review 25, 2. [In Korean]

Auh, Soo Young. 1994. Cambio de valores y democratizacion en Corea del Sur. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Barker, David. 1992. Changing social values in Europe. Business Ethics. A European Review 1: 91-103. Barker, David. 1993. Values and volunteering. In Justin Davis-Smith, Volunteering in Europe. Berkhamsted: The Volunteer Centre.

Barker, D., L. Halman, and A. Vloet. 1992. The European Values Study 1981-1990. Summary Report. London: The Gordon Cook Foundation.

Basanez, Miguel. 1993. Is Mexico Headed Toward its Fifth Crisis? in Riordan Roett (ed.) Political and Economic Liberalizatin in Mexico. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

Basanez, Miguel. 1993. "Protestant and Catholic Ethics: An Empirical Comparison," paper presented at conference on Changing Social and Political Values: A Global Perspective, Complutense University, Madrid, September 27-October 1.

Basanez, Miguel. 1994. Winners and Losers of NAFTA in Mexico. in Brenda M. McPhail (ed.) NAFTA Now! The Changing Political Economy of North America. Latham, MD: University Press of America.

Basanez, Miguel, and Alejandro Moreno. 1994. Mexico en la Encuesta Mundial de Valores 1981-1990. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Bashkirova, Elena. 1994. Cambio de actitudes politicas y los valores en la URSS y Russia. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Becker, Henk. 1995. Generations and Value Change. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Brechon, Pierre. 1995. Les Europeens et la politique. Futuribles, 200 (July-August): 63-84.

Brechon, Pierre. (1997). Religions et politique en Europe. Paris.

Breen, G., and C.T. Whelan. 1993. Social class, class origins and political partisanship in the Republic of Ireland. European Journal of Political Research 25.

Broek, Andries van den, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Eastern Europe after 1989. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Broek, Andries van den, and Felix Heunks. 1993. Political culture. Patterns of political orientations and behavior. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Broek, Andries van den. 1997. "Cohort Replacelment and Generation Formation in Western Polities." in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Capraro, G. 1992. I valori degli Italiani nel contesto Europeo. Presbyteri XXVI 9: 679-702.

Capraro, G. 1992. I valori degli Italiani negli anni Ottanta secondo un'indagine Europea. Pp. 197-207 in CET, Le regioni del Nord-Est, Societa, economia e ambiente. Padova: Messaggero.

Capraro, G. 1993. Valori Europei e loro trasmissione in un-Europa aperta. In AA.VV. Anziani e Cultura Europea. Atti del Convegno Naziale della Federuni Trento. Vicenza: Rezzara.

Capraro, G. 1993. Sociologia e religione: teoria e ricerca empirica. Brescia: Morcelliana.

Capraro, G., and R. Gubert. 1993. I valori degli Europei. Trento: Regione Autonoma Trentino-Alta Adige.

Carballo de Cilley, Marita, and Carlos Matheus. 1994. Actitudes y valores politicos y laborales: comparacion entre Brasil y Argentina. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Chauvel, Louis. 1993. Les valeurs dans la Communaute Europeenne: l'erosion des extremismes. Observations et Diagnostics Economiques, Revue de l'OPCE.

Chauvel, Louis. 1995. Valeurs regionales et nationales en Europe. Futuribles, 200 (July-August): 167-200.

Chiu, Hei Yuan. 1994. Valores de la educacion en la sociedad Taiwanesa. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Clarke, Harold D., Allan Kornberg, Chris McIntyre, Petra Bauer, and Max Kaase. 1999. "The Impact of Economic Priorities on the Measurement of Value Change: New Experimental Evidence." American Political Science Review 93 (September).

Conci, A. 1993. I valori degli Europei fra evoluzione e nostalgia. Rivista di Teologia Morale XXV 1: 55-72.

Dalton, Russell J. 1993. Politics in Germany, 2nd edition. New York: Harper Collins.

Dalton, Russell J. 1994. The Green Rainbow: Environmental Groups in Western Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dalton, Russell J. . A Crisis of Confidence in Advanced Industrial Societies? in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Davie, G. 1992. God and Caesar: Religion in a Rapidly Changing Europe. in J. Bailey (ed.) Social Europe. London and New York: Longman.

Davis, Darren W., and Christian Davenport. 1999. "Assessing the Validity of Postmaterialism." American Political Science Review 93 (September).

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. Human Studies No. 7 "Fairness," semi-annual report by Dentsu Institute for Human Studies (in Japanese and English).

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. Human Studies No. 9 "Sense of Values," semi-annual report by Dentsu Institute for Human Studies (in Japanese and English).

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. Human Studies No. 11 "A New Course for the U.S.; A New Direction for Japan," semi-annual report by Dentsu Institute for Human Studies (in Japanese and English).

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. Nihon No Chouryuu (Japanese Trends) -- Quality of Society (in Japanese). PHP-Kennkyuusho Publishing Company.

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. 1997. Ibunnka Tositeno Nihon to Amerika. Tokyo: Nannundou Publishing Company.

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies. 1998. Ibunnka Likai to Ibunnka Masatsu. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shinnbunnsha.

Dentsu Institute for Human Studies and The Leisure Development Center of Japan. 1994. Japon en una perspectiva comparativa. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco

Dekker, Paul and Andries van den Broek. 1997. "Volunteering and Politics: Involvement in Voluntary Associations from a 'Civic Culture' Perspective." in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Diez Medrano, Juan . 1994. El significado de los concepios de izquierda y de derecha: una perspectiva comparada. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Diez Medrano, Juan. 1997. "Does Western Europe Stop at the Pyrenees?" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Diez Nicolas, Juan. 1994. Postmaterialismo y desarollo economico. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Dobbelaere, Karel. 1993. Church involvement and secularization: Making sense of the European case. In. E. Barker, J.A. Beckford, and K Dobbelaere (eds.), Secularization, Rationalism and Sectarism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Dobbelaere, Karel, and Wolfgang Jagodzinski. 1995. Religious cognitions and beliefs. In Jan W. van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.), The Impact of Values. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Dobbelaere, Karel. 1995. Religion in Europe and North America. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Dogan, Mattei. 1994. The decline of nationalism within Western Europe. Comparative Politics, April: 281-305.

Dogan, Mattei. 1994. The erosion of Nationalism in the European Community. in M. Haller and R. Richter (eds.) Towards a European Nation? New York: Sharpe: 31-54.

Dogan, Mattei. 1995. The decline of Class Voting and of Religious Vote in Western Europe. International Social Science Journal, 146: 525-538.

Dogan, Mattei. 1995. Le Declin des Croyances Relgieuses en Europe Occidentale. Revue Internationale des Sciences Sociales, 3. 461-476.

Dogan, Mattei. 1995. Testing the Concepts of Legitimacy and Trust. in H.E. Chehabi and Alfred Stepan (eds.) Politics, Society and Democracy: Essays in Honor of Juan Linz. Boulder: Westview Press.

Doring, H. 1992. Higher education and confidence in institutions: A secondary analysis of the 'European Values Survey', 1981-83. West European Politics 15: 126-46.

Duch, Raymond M., and Michael A. Taylor. 1994. A reply to 'Education, security, and postmaterialism.' American Journal of Political Science 38:xxx-xxx.

Elzo, Javier. 1994. Nacionalismo, nacionalidad y religion en Euskalerria. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Elzo, Javier, F.A. Orizo, M.A. Barreda, F. Garmendia, P.G. Blasco, and J.F. Santacoloma. 1992. Euskalerria ante la Encuesta Europea de Valores. Son Los Vascos Diferentas? Bilbao: Universidad De Deusto Deiker. Elzo, Javier, et al. 1991. Construir Europa: Euskadi. Editorial Areces.

Elzo, Javier, et al. 1992. Drogas y Escuela IV. Escuela Universitaria de Trabajo Social. San Sebastian. Elzo, Javier, et al. 1992. Euskadi ante las Drogas 92. Informe sobre la evolucion del consumo de tasbaco, alcohol y demas drogas en los ultimos diez anos. Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco.

Elzo, Javier, et al. 1993. Giovani e religione in Spagna. In Luigi Tomasi (ed.), Persistenze Valiorioli e Nuovi Orientananti. Trento: Reverdito Edizioni.

Elzo, Javier, et al. 1994. Jovenes espanoles. Editorial S.M. Madrid. Ester, Peter, and Loek Halman. Forthcoming. Empirical trends in religious and moral beliefs in Western Europe. A cross-sectional longitudinal analysis: 1981-1990. In M. Haller and R. Richter (eds.), Towards a European Nation? Political Trends in Europe. New York: Sharpe.

Ester, Peter, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Value shift in western societies. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Ester, Peter, Loek Halman, and Brigitte Seuren. 1993. Environmental concern in Europe and North America. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Ester, Peter, Loek Halman, and H. Vinken. 1992. Zur diffusion und kristallisation von wertorientierungen in der Niederlandischen Bevolkerung. H.H. Medien, Medienwissenschaftliche Beitrage der Heinrich-Heine-Universitat Dusseldorf, Heft 2/3 December: 36-59.

Franca, Luis de. 1993. Portugal, valores Europeus, identidade cultural. Lisbon: Instituto de Estudos para o Desenvolvimento.

Fuchs, Dieter. Germany: East and West. in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Fuchs, Dieter, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1995. Citizens and the state: A changing relationship? In Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs (eds.), Citizens and the State. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Gabriel, Oscar W. 1995. "Political Efficacy and Trust," in Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gabriel, Oscar W. "Distrust, Involvement and Political Protest in Western Democracies." in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Galland, Olivier and Yannick Lemel. 1995. "La Permanence des differences: une comparison des systemes de valeurs entre pays europeens." Futuribles, 200 (July-August): 113-130/

Gibbins, John and Bo Reimer. 1995. "Postmodernism," in Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gold, H., and A. Webster. 1990. New Zealand Values Today. Palmerston North: Alpha.

Granato, Jim, Ronald Inglehart and David Leblang. 1996a. "The Effect of Culture on Economic Development: Theory, Hypotheses and Some Empirical Tests." American Journal of Political Science 40,3: 607-31.

Granato, Jim, Ronald Inglehart and David Leblang. 1996b. "Cultural Values, Stable Democracy and Economic Development: A Reply." American Journal of Political Science 40,3: 680-96.

Gubert, Renzo (ed.). 1992. Persitenze e mutamenti dei Valori degli Italinan nel Contesto Europea. Trento: Reverdito Edizioni.

Gubert, Renzo. 1995. Analysis of Regional Differences in the Values of European. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Gundelach, Peter, and Ole Riis. 1993. Danskernes Voerdier. Kobenhavn K.: Forlaget Sociologi.

Gundelach, Peter, and Ole Riis. 1994. El retorno al familismo? In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Gundelach, Peter. 1994. National Value Differences" Modernization or Institutionalization? International Journal of Comparative Studies. 35: 37-58.

Gundelach, Peter and Svend Kreiner. 1997. "Individualization or Neo-Conservatism?" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek. 1992. Culturele identiteit: Waardevol of waardeloos? Rawoo Lunchlezing 28, April.

Halman, Loek. 1994. Westerse waarden. Wat weten wij van onze cultuur? In M. Veldhuis, Cultuur en Ontwikkeling. Rawoo Lezingenserie 1992. Den Haag: Rawoo.

Halman, Loek. 1995. La comparazione dei valori nell'European Value Study. La misurazione dei valori e il problema della comparabilita. In R. Gubert and G. Capraro (eds.), I Valori degli Eurpei negli anni Novanta. Trento: University of Trento.

Halman, Loek. 1994. Scandinavian values. How special are they? In Thorleif Pettersson and Ole Riis (eds.), Religious and Moral Values in Scandinavian Countries. Stockholm: Almqvist Wiksell International.

Halman, Loek. Variatoins in Tolerance levels in Europe. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research. 2: 15-38.

Halman, Loek, K. Dobbelaere, R. de Moor, and L. Voye. 1992. Godsdienst en kerk in Belgie en Nederland. Sociologische Gids 92/5-6: 285-99.

Halman, Loek, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Comparative research on values. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Religion, churches and moral values. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek, and Ruud de Moor. 1993. Value patterns and modernity. In Peter Ester, Loek Halman, and Ruud de Moor (eds.), The Individualizing Society: Value Change in Europe and North America. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek, and Ruud de Moor. 1994. Individualizacion y cambio de valores en Europa y Norteamerica. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Halman, Loek. 1995. Is there a Moral Decline? A cross-national Inquiry into Morality in Contemporary Society. International Social Science Journal 145:419-440.

Halman, Loek and Neil Nevitte. 1997. "Political Values, Identification , Participation and Value Change" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek and Thorleif Petterson. 1995. Individualization and Value Fragmentation. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek and Thorleif Pettersson. "The Shifting Sources of Moralitiy: From Religion to Post-materialist?" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Halman, Loek and Ton Heinen. "Left and Right in Modern Society." in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Harding, Stephen D. and Frans J. Hikspoors. 1995. New Work Values: in Theory and in Practice. International Social Science Journal 145: 441-456.

Hardiman, N., and C.T. Whelan. 1994. "Politics and Democratic Values in the Republic of Ireland." in Christopher T. Whelan (ed.) Values and Social Change in Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.

Hardiman, N., and C.T. Whelan. 1994. "Values in Political Partisanship." in Christopher T. Whelan (ed.) Values and Social Change in Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.

Huenks, Felix and Frans Hikspoors. 1995. Political Culture, 1960-1990. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Huenks, Felix. 1997. "Patterns of Social and Political Integration" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Honne, Sissel. 1994. Rekkefolgeeffekt -- et seigt og magert tema? Om formeffekter i den norske verdiundersokelsen [On Form Effects in the Norweigian Values Survey]. Thesis, Department of Sociology and Political Science, University of Trondheim, 1994

Hornsby-Smith, M.P., and C.T. Whelan. 1994. "Religious and Moral Values in Ireland" in Christo pher T. Whelan (ed.) Values and Social Change in Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.

Hornsby-Smith, M.P. and M. Procter. 1995. Catholic Identity, Religious Context and Environmental Values in Western Europe. Social Compass 42: 27-34.

Huseby, Beate and Ola Listhaug. 1995. Identifications of Norwegians with Europe: The Impact of Values and Center-Periphery Factors. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1992. Changing values in industrial societies: The case of North America, 1981-1990. Politics and the Individual 2, 2:1-31.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1992. Vergleichende wertewandelforschung (revised 2nd edition). In Ferdinand Müeller-Rommel and Dirk Berg-Schlosser (eds.), Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft (Leverkusen: Leske Verlag) 125-44.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1993. Democratizacao em perspectiva global. Opinao Publica (July-August):9-42. Inglehart, Ronald. 1993. Modernizacion y post-modernizacion: la cambiante relacion entre el desarrollo economico, cambio cultural y politico. In Juan Diez Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.) Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1994. Les valeurs des europeens: Existe-il un systeme des valeurs europeen? Futuribles, November.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. Public support for environmental problems: Objective problems and subjective values. PS Political Science and Politics.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. Changing Values, Economic Development and Political Change. International Social Science Journal 145: 379-404.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1999. "Modernization Erodes Respect for Authority but Enhances Support for Democracy." in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1999. "Trust, Well-Being and Democracy," in Mark Warren (ed.), Democracy and Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Inglehart, Ronald. 1999. "Equivalence in Comparative Research: Comparing Values across Cultures." In Jan Van Deth (ed.) Different but Similar: Establishing Equivalence in International Comparative Research. Oxford, Oxford University.

Inglehart, Ronald, Miguel Basanez and Alejandro Moreno. 1998. Human Values and Beliefs: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Inglehart, Ronald, Neil Nevitte and Miguel Basanez. 1996. The North American Trajectory: Cultural, Economic and Political Ties among the U.S., Canada and Mexico. Hawthorne, N.Y.: Aldine.

Inglehart, Ronald, and Paul R. Abramson. 1994. Economic security and value change, 1970-1993. American Political Science Review, June:336-54.

Inglehart, Ronald and Paul R. Abramson. 1999. Measuring Postmaterialism. American Political Science Review, September

Inglehart, Ronald, and Rudy Andeweg. 1993. Change in Dutch political culture: A silent or a silenced revolution? West European Politics, July:345-61.

Inglehart, Ronald and Marita Carballo. 1997. "Does Latin America Exist? (And is there a ConfucianCulture?): A Global Analysis of Cross-Cultural Differences. PS: Political Science and Politics. 30, 1: 34-46.

Inglehart, Ronald, and Terry N. Clark. 1991. Nowa Kultura Polityczna (The New Political Culture) (Warsaw). Reprinted in Hungarian as "Az uj politikai kultura," in Gabor Peteri (ed.), Helyi Demokracia es Ujitasok (Reforming Local Democracy) (Budapest: Alapitvany kiadvanya, 1992) 22-96.

Inglehart, Ronald, Miguel Basanez, and Neil Nevitte. 1994. Convergencia en Norteamerica: Comercio, Politica y Cultura. Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.

Jagodzinski, Wolfgang, and Karel Dobbelaere. 1993. Die amtskirchen im prozess der modernisierung. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 33: 68-91.

Jagodzinski, Wolfgang, and Karel Dobbelaere. 1995. Religious and ethical pluralism. In Jan W. van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.), The Impact of Values. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Jagodzinski, Wolfgang, and Karel Dobbelaere. 1995. Secularization and church religiosity. In Jan W. van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.), The Impact of Values. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Kaase, Max and Kenneth Newton. 1995. Beliefs in Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kalaycioglu, Ersin. 1994. Elections and Party Preferences in Turkey. Comparative Political Studies 27,3: 402-424.

Kerkhofs, Jan 1990. Europa. Waardenontwikkeling of -ontworteling? Ondernemen VKW Brussel, 46: 525-31.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. L'Europe a une nouvelle croisee des chemins; vers une autre echelle de valuers. Lumen Vitae 47: 15-24

. Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. Europa heute -aus der sicht der kirchen. Communio 21: 295-304

. Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. A quel point l'Europe est-elle religieuse? Concilium 1992, nr. 240: 97-107.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. Waarden-evolutie van jongeren in een postmoderne cultuur. Ethische Perspectieven 2: 3-7.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. Mutations des valeurs en Europe. L'Entreprise et l'homme 64: 215-20.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. Waardenverschuivingen in Europa en Belgie. Cultuur in Beweging 19, 4: 21-24.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. La problematique familiale selon des recentes etudes sur les valeurs. Cahiers Ceppes, nr. 3: 137-42.

Kerkhofs, Jan. 1992. L'Europe: Une autre echelle de valeurs. Christus, nr. 156, okt.: 499-508.

Kerkhofs, J. 1992. Jongeren en waarden in een postmoderne cultuur. Korrel Cahier, Altiora, Averbode: 5-11.

Kerkhofs, Jan., Karel Dobbelaere, Lilianne Voye, and Bernadette Bawin-Legros (eds.). 1992. De Versnelde Ommekeer. Tielt: Lannoo.

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1995. The Convergence of Party Positions and Voter Orientations. In Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs (eds.), Citizens and the State. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter and Dieter Fuchs (eds.) 1995. Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. . Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: Global Trends, in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Gurgling Lass, and Katrin Mattusch. 1994. Nationalitatenkonflikt und mechanismen politischer integration im Baltikum. In Dieter Segert (Hrsg.), Konfliktregulierung durch Parteien und Politische Stabilitat in Ostmitteleuropa. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Gurgling Lass, and Katrin Mattusch. 1994. La orientacion de valores y la participacion politica en los Estados Balticos. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Knutsen, Oddbjorn. 1995. "Left-Right Materialist Orientations," in Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knutsen, Oddbjorn and Elinor Scarbrough. 1995. "Cleavage Politics," in Jan Van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knutsen, Oddbjorn. 1997. "The Impact of Old Politics and New Politics Value Orientations on Party Choice." in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Lagos, Marta. . Developments in Transitional Democracis in Latin America, in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Lambert, Yves. 1993. Effet d'age, de generation et de periode dans l'evolution religieuse. Revue Francaise de Sociologie.

Lambert, Yves. 1993. Les jeunes et le christianisme: Le grand defi. In Gallimard (ed.), Le Debat.

Lambert, Yves. 1993. Ages, generations et christianisme en France et en Europe. Revue Francaise de Sociologie, XXXIV.

Lambert, Yves. 1994. Les regimes confessionels et l'etat du sentiment religieux. In Jean Bauberot, Religion et Laicite dans l'Europe des Douze. Paris: Syros.

Lambert, Yves, and Guy Michelat. 1992. Crepuscule des religions chez les jeunes? Paris: L'Harmettan.

Lambert, Yves. 1995. Vers une ere post-chretienne? Futuribles, 200 (July-August): 85-112.

Larsen, Max D. 1994. Satisfaccion del consumidor con los servicios gubernamentales. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Laumenskaite, E. 1991. Does Lithuania return to Christian faith. Kataliku Pasaulis 1 [in Lithuanian].

Laumenskaite, E. 1992. The face of religion and its role in the reconstruction of the society in Lithuania. Religion Today, Summer 1992, Vol. 7, No. 3.

Laumenskaite, E. 1993. Religion and the church in Lithuania: The present and the perspectives. Naujasis Zidinys, No. 7-8.

Laumenskaite, E. Forthcoming. Attitudes to family and religion in Lithuania. In Religion, Family and Social Changes. Los Angeles.

Lee, Aie-Rie. 1993. Culture shift and popular protest in South Korea. Comparative Political Studies 26, 1:63-80.

Leschinsky, Achim. 1996. Vorleben oder Nachdenken? Bericht der wissenschaftlischen Begleitung ueber den Modellversuch zum Lernbereich 'Lebensgestaltung-Ethik-Religion' Frankfurt: Verlag Moritz Diesterweg.

Lesthaeghe, Ron, Guy Moors, and Loek Halman. 1992. Living arrangements and values among young adults in the Netherlands, Belgium, France and Germany, 1990. IPD-Working Paper 1992-3, Brussel: Centrum Sociologie, Vrije Universiteit.

Lesthaeghe, Ron and Guy Moore. 1995. Living Arrangements and Parenthood: Do Values Matter? in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Lindseth, Odd Helge. 1993. Samme himmel, samme samfunn? Religion som normregulator blant protestanter og katolikker i Nord-Amerika og Vest-Europa [One Heaven, One Society? Religion as a Regulator of Norms among Protestants and Catholics in North America and Western Europe]. Thesis, Department of Sociology and Political Science, University of Trondheim.

Lindseth, Odd Helge, and Ola Listhaug. 1994. Religion y valores del trabajo en los noventa: un estudio comparativo de Europa Occidental y Estados Unidos. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Lindseth, Odd Helge, and Ola Listhaug. 1994. Religion and work values in the 1990s: A comparative study of Western Europe and North America. In Thorleif Pettersson and Ole Riis (eds.), Religious and Moral Values in the Scandinavian Countries. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.

Listhaug, Ola. 1991. Norske verdier 1982-1990: Stabilitet og endring [Norwegian Values 1982-1990: Stability and Change]. ISS -rapport nr. 30: University of Trondheim.

Listhaug, Ola. 1995 . The impact of modernization and value change on confidence in institutions. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Listhaug, Ola, and Beate Huseby. 1990. Values in Norway 1990: Study description and codebook. ISS -rapport nr. 29: University of Trondheim.

Listhaug, Ola, and Matti Wiberg. 1995. Confidence in political and private institutions. In Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs (eds.), Citizens and the State: Changing Public Attitudes toward Government in Western Europe. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Liubsiene, E. 1993. Lithuanian survey of the families raising disabled children. Report for a Regional Seminar for the Baltic States: "The Future of Children with Disabilities in the Baltic States." Vilnius.

Lu, Hai-Qi. 1994. Aproximacion a la posicion de la mujer china en actividades economicas, sociales y politicas. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Magun, Vladimir S. 1997 The Job Values from the Comparative Point of View. (Rossiiskie trudovye cennosti v sravnitel'noi perspective) In: Sociological Readings. Vol.2. Moscow. Open Society Institute; Institute of Sociology RAS. (In Russian)

Magun, Vladimir S. 1996 Job Values of the Russian Society. (Trudovye cennosti rossiiskogo obcshestva) In: Social Sciences and Modernity, #6.(In Russian)

Magun, Vladimir S. 1996 Labor Culture. In: D.Shalin (ed.) Russian Culture at the Crossroads. Paradoxes of Postcommunist Consciousness. Westview Press. (In English)

Magun, Vladimir S. 1996 Job Values of the Russian Population. ( Trudovye cennosti rossiiskogo naselenia) In: Problems of Economics, #1. (In Russian)

Magun, Vladimir S. 1996 Activity and Achievement Orientations in the Job Values of Russian People. (Aktivnost' i dostizhitel'nost' v structure trudovyh cennostei rossiiskogo naselenia) In: The Labor-market Development and Social Mobility in Russia. Social-Labor Studies. Vol.4 (In collaboration with Ju.Arzhakova and A.Kryshtanovsky, in Russian)

Magun, Vladimir S. 1995 Job Values of the Russian People: Socialist Model and Postsocialist Reality. (Trudovye cennosti rossiiskogo naselenia: socialisticheskaya model' i postsocialisticheskaya real'nost') In: T.Zaslavskaya (ed). Where is Russia coming?...The Alternatives of Social Development. Vol. II. Moscow (in Russian).

Marques, Guilhermina. 1991. Les valeurs des jeunes Suisses entre 15 et 19 ans. Geneva: Johann Jacobs Foundation.

Mattusch, Katrin. 1994. Demokratisierung und politische kultur im Baltikum. Dissertation: Freie Universitaet Berlin.

Mebs, Kanji and Neil Nevitte. 1997. "Unpacking Environmental Orientations: Deep or Superficial?" in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Melich, Anna (ed.). 1991. Les Valeurs des Suisses. Berne: Lange Verlag. [German version: Die Werte der Schweizer. Berne: Lang.]

Melich, Anna. 1994. Insatisfacion nacional y desconfianza europea: el caso de Suiza. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Melich, Anna. 1995. National Dissatisfaction and Distrust in Europe: the case of Switzerland. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Montero, Jose Ramon, and Mariano Torcal. 1994. Cambio cultural, reemplazo generacional y politica en Espana. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

de Moor, Ruud. 1995. Religion and Moral Values: The Case of Euthanasia. in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tiburg: Tilburg University Press.

Myers, D.G. 1992. The Pursuit of Happiness. New York: William Morrow and Company.

Nas, Masja. 1995. "Green, Greener, Greenest". In Jan W. van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough (eds.), The Impact of Values. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Nevitte, Neil. 1991. New politics, the charter and political participation. In Herman Bakvis (ed.), Representation, Integration and Political Parties in Canada. Toronto: Dundurn Press. Vol. 14. Report of the Royal Commission on Electoral Change and Party Financing, 1991: 355-417.

Nevitte, Neil. 1994. Se ha vuelto la gente mas tolerante? Evidencias de la Encuesta Mundial de Valores 1981-1990. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Nevitte, Neil. 1996. The Decline of Deference. Toronto: Broadview Press.

Nevitte, Neil. Forthcoming. Bringing values "back in": Value change and North American integration. In D. Barry (ed.), Toward a North American Community? Canada, United States and Mexico. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Nevitte, Neil. Forthcoming. NAFTA: Why not before now? In B. McPhail (ed.), NAFTA Now! The Changing Political Economy of North America. University Press of America.

Nevitte, Neil. 1997. "Tolerance and Intolerance in Advanced Industrial Societies: The Cross-Time Evidence. in Loek Halman and Neil Nevitte (eds.) Political Value Change in Western Democracies: Integration, Values, Identification and Participation. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Nevitte, Neil and Herman Bakvis. 1992. The greening of the Canadian electorate: Environmentalism, ideology and partisanship. In Robert Boardman (ed.), Canadian Environmental Policy: Ecosystems, Politics and Process. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.

Nevitte, Neil, W. Brandon, and L. Davis. 1993. The American abortion controversy: Lessons from cross-national evidence. Politics and the Life Sciences 12 (1), February: 19-30.

Nevitte, Neil, and Ian Brodie. 1993. Evaluating the citizen's constitution theory. Canadian Journal of Political Science XXVI, June 2: 235-59

. Nevitte, Neil, and Ian Brodie. 1993. Clarifying differences: A rejoinder to Alan Cairn's defence of the citizen's constitution theory. Canadian Journal of Political Science XXVI, June 2: 269-72.

Nevitte, Neil, and Ronald Inglehart. 1992. Directions of value change in North America. In Steven Randall (ed.), North America Without Borders (Calgary: University of Calgary Press) 245-259.

Nevitte, Neil and Ronald Inglehart. 1995. North American Value Change and Integration: Lessons from Western Europe? in Ruud de Moor (ed.) Values in Western Societies. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

Nevitte, Neil and Mebs Kanji. 1995. "Explaining Environmental Concern and Action in Canada." Applied Behavoral Science Review, 3:1: 85-102.

Nevitte, Neil, and M. Wohlfeld. 1990. Postindustrial value change and support for native issues. Canadian Ethnic Studies 22, 3: 56-88. Newton, Kenneth. . The Impact of Social Trust on Political Support, in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999

. Norris, Pippa . The Growth of Critical Citizens? in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Nye, Joseph and Pippa Norris . Conclusions: Strengthening Democratic Government, in Pippa Norris (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Orizo, Francisco Andres. 1991. El Sistema de Valors dels Catalans. Barcelona: Institut Catala d'Etudes Mediterranis.

Orizo, Francisco Andres. 1991. Los Nuevos Valores de los Espanoles. Madrid: Fundacion Santa Maria.

Orizo, Francisco Andres. 1994. Los valores de libertad en Espana. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco

. Orizo, Francisco Andres, and Alejandro Sanchez Fernandez. 1993. El Sistema de Valors dels Catalans. Barcelona: Institut Catala d'Estudis Mediterranis.

Ortiz, Angel I. Rivera, and Jorge Beritez Nazario. 1994. Cambio en valores e identidad nacional: el caso de Puerto Rico desde una perspectiva comparada. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Osti, G. 1993. Dimensioni dell 'insediamento e associazionismo. Annali di Sociologia-Sociologisches Jahrbuch 9: 18. Pettersson, Thorleif. 1994. Individualizacion, secularizacion y cambio de valor moral en la Escandinavia contemporanea. In Juan Diez-Nicolas and Ronald Inglehart (eds.), Tendencias mundiales de Cambio en los Valores sociales y politicos. Madrid: Libros de Fundesco.

Purvaneckiene, G. 1993. Individo psichologine busena ir seima. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia 2: 128.

Purvaneckiene, G. 1993. Lietuvos motery vertybines orientacijos keiciantis politinei bei ekonominei padeciai. Visuomene: Politikos, Visuomenes ir Kulturos Zurnalas 1 (22).